2018
DOI: 10.1111/arcm.12438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring post‐excavation degradation potential of fungal communities associated with archaeological human remains

Abstract: Fungal communities associated with three osteoarchaeological samples from distinct archaeological sites (Tărian, Turdaş, Feleacu) in Transylvania, Romania, characterized by similar environmental conditions (wet soils), different historical age and amount of time spent in storage, were examined in order to register site-versus storage-specific species. Physical anthropological taphonomic scoring was correlated with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) indices in order to characterize mineral and organ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…environment, or the post-excavation storage environment. Limited research has been carried out on post-excavation microbial growth, but some studies suggest that most of the microbiota on archaeological bone stem from the burial environment [65][66][67]. In this case, oxidation of…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…environment, or the post-excavation storage environment. Limited research has been carried out on post-excavation microbial growth, but some studies suggest that most of the microbiota on archaeological bone stem from the burial environment [65][66][67]. In this case, oxidation of…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional high‐vacuum SEM is not suited to the examination of biomaterials such as bone, as it requires samples to be conductive. Although samples may be coated with conductive material (e.g., gold, gold–palladium, carbon and chromium) to facilitate SEM examination, [ 28,29 ] coatings cannot be removed, thereby permanently altering the sample and making this approach non‐ideal for examination of rare, precious and unique archaeological finds. Additionally, the X‐rays from the applied conductive coating are detected in EDS analysis and can obscure/overlap with the X‐rays from the specimen, [ 30 ] making interpretation of the specimen's elemental profile difficult or even impossible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%