“…10 c), however the evidence is very uncertain with substantial heterogeneity. Sheedy 2022 [ 37 ], a retrospective cohort study, found that skin-to-skin contact increased the rate of exclusive breastfeeding at discharge (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.79–2.82) but did not provide the raw data. Fig.…”
Background
Skin-to-skin contact between mother and infant after birth is recommended to promote breastfeeding and maternal-infant bonding. However, its impact on the incidence of neonatal hypoglycaemia is unknown. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess this.
Methods
Published randomised control trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, non-randomised studies of interventions, cohort, or case–control studies with an intervention of skin-to-skin care compared to other treatment were included without language or date restrictions. The primary outcome was neonatal hypoglycaemia (study-defined). We searched 4 databases and 4 trial registries from inception to May 12th, 2023. Quality of studies was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 1 or Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment tools. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results were synthesised using RevMan 5.4.1 or STATA and analysed using random-effects meta-analyses where possible, otherwise with direction of findings tables. This review was registered prospectively on PROSPERO (CRD42022328322).
Results
This review included 84,900 participants in 108 studies, comprising 65 RCTs, 16 quasi-RCTs, seven non-randomised studies of intervention, eight prospective cohort studies, nine retrospective cohort studies and three case–control studies. Evidence suggests skin-to-skin contact may result in a large reduction in the incidence of neonatal hypoglycaemia (7 RCTs/quasi-RCTs, 922 infants, RR 0.29 (0.13, 0.66), p < 0.0001, I2 = 47%). Skin-to-skin contact may reduce the incidence of admission to special care or neonatal intensive care nurseries for hypoglycaemia (1 observational study, 816 infants, OR 0.50 (0.25–1.00), p = 0.050), but the evidence is very uncertain. Skin-to-skin contact may reduce duration of initial hospital stay after birth (31 RCTs, 3437 infants, MD -2.37 (-3.66, -1.08) days, p = 0.0003, I2 = 90%, p for Egger’s test = 0.02), and increase exclusive breastmilk feeding from birth to discharge (1 observational study, 1250 infants, RR 4.30 (3.19, 5.81), p < 0.0001), but the evidence is very uncertain.
Conclusion
Skin-to-skin contact may lead to a large reduction in the incidence of neonatal hypoglycaemia. This, along with other established benefits, supports the practice of skin-to-skin contact for all infants and especially those at risk of hypoglycaemia.
“…10 c), however the evidence is very uncertain with substantial heterogeneity. Sheedy 2022 [ 37 ], a retrospective cohort study, found that skin-to-skin contact increased the rate of exclusive breastfeeding at discharge (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.79–2.82) but did not provide the raw data. Fig.…”
Background
Skin-to-skin contact between mother and infant after birth is recommended to promote breastfeeding and maternal-infant bonding. However, its impact on the incidence of neonatal hypoglycaemia is unknown. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess this.
Methods
Published randomised control trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, non-randomised studies of interventions, cohort, or case–control studies with an intervention of skin-to-skin care compared to other treatment were included without language or date restrictions. The primary outcome was neonatal hypoglycaemia (study-defined). We searched 4 databases and 4 trial registries from inception to May 12th, 2023. Quality of studies was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 1 or Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment tools. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results were synthesised using RevMan 5.4.1 or STATA and analysed using random-effects meta-analyses where possible, otherwise with direction of findings tables. This review was registered prospectively on PROSPERO (CRD42022328322).
Results
This review included 84,900 participants in 108 studies, comprising 65 RCTs, 16 quasi-RCTs, seven non-randomised studies of intervention, eight prospective cohort studies, nine retrospective cohort studies and three case–control studies. Evidence suggests skin-to-skin contact may result in a large reduction in the incidence of neonatal hypoglycaemia (7 RCTs/quasi-RCTs, 922 infants, RR 0.29 (0.13, 0.66), p < 0.0001, I2 = 47%). Skin-to-skin contact may reduce the incidence of admission to special care or neonatal intensive care nurseries for hypoglycaemia (1 observational study, 816 infants, OR 0.50 (0.25–1.00), p = 0.050), but the evidence is very uncertain. Skin-to-skin contact may reduce duration of initial hospital stay after birth (31 RCTs, 3437 infants, MD -2.37 (-3.66, -1.08) days, p = 0.0003, I2 = 90%, p for Egger’s test = 0.02), and increase exclusive breastmilk feeding from birth to discharge (1 observational study, 1250 infants, RR 4.30 (3.19, 5.81), p < 0.0001), but the evidence is very uncertain.
Conclusion
Skin-to-skin contact may lead to a large reduction in the incidence of neonatal hypoglycaemia. This, along with other established benefits, supports the practice of skin-to-skin contact for all infants and especially those at risk of hypoglycaemia.
“…There is an increasing amount of scientific research regarding the crucial benefits of timely SSC for mother-baby dyads. SSC after birth has a favorable effect on the newborn's cardiorespiratory and thermoregulation stabilization, reducing the duration of crying, ensuring a successful start to breastfeeding and metabolic stability [2,16,17]. Immediate SSC has a positive effect on decreasing neonatal stress and blood cortisol concentration and helps to sustain blood glucose balance [18].…”
Background and aims: An excessive weight loss (EWL) of >10% after birth is associated with serious health outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine factors that can reduce weight loss in full-term, exclusively breastfed infants after birth. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational, single-center study. We included 642 healthy, full-term, exclusively breastfed neonates born in 2019 in a baby-friendly hospital, and their healthy mothers. The exclusion criteria were as follows: supplementation with formula, multiple pregnancies, and neonates or mothers with health issues. Results: The mean percentage of neonatal weight loss after 24 h of life was 5.13%, and that after 48 h was 6.34%. Neonates delivered via a caesarean section lost more weight after 24 and 48 h of life than those delivered via vaginal delivery (p < 0.01). There is a noticeable pattern that neonates tend to lose more weight if they do not get skin-to-skin contact (SSC) and breastfeeding within the first hour after birth (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Neonates born via a CS tend to lose more weight after 24 and 48 h of life. Immediate SSC and breastfeeding in the first hour after delivery may decrease the excessive weight loss.
“…O contato pele a pele é essencial para a saúde física e emocional da mãe e do recém-nascido, além de promover o bem-estar, essa prática pode melhorar a vivência do parto, ajuda a prevenir a hipotermia em RN, a promover a amamentação precoce, fortalecer o vínculo entre mãe e filho e influenciar positivamente para a alta hospitalar (MACHOLD et al, 2021;SHEEDY;STULZ;STEVENS, 2022;SOUZA et al, 2020).…”
pelo Instituto Pesquisa & Ciência (CNPJ: 25.255.510/0001-30), procura a promoção da pesquisa científica, com base nas diversas áreas do conhecimento e com a presença multidisciplinar de pesquisadores, estudantes e profissionais, de modo a contribuir com a troca de experiências e aprendizado científico.Conteúdo, revisão gramatical, erros de linguagem, correção e confiabilidade dos estudos contidos nesse e-book, são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores, que não representam a posição oficial do Instituto Pesquisa & Ciência. O compartilhamento e download da obra é permitido, desde que os créditos aos autores sejam atribuídos.Feita por pares, a avaliação cega foi realizada pelos membros do Conselho Editorial, descritos nessa edição, todos os estudos foram avaliados e aprovados para publicação, seguindo critérios de neutralidade e imparcialidade.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
