Abstract:PurposeMistreatment of medical students by patients has not been qualitatively explored in the literature. The authors sought to develop a rich understanding of the impact and consequences of medical students' experiences of mistreatment by patients.
MethodThis exploratory descriptive qualitative study was conducted at a large Canadian medical school from April-November 2020. Fourteen medical students were recruited for semistructured interviews. Students were asked about their experiences of mistreatment by p… Show more
“…For example, in LN and NRJ's research into student mistreatment by patients, the team wrestled with interpretations of data that represented racism and sexism. 20 NRJ and another co-author, who identify as visible minorities, brought rich insights to this data interpretation from their own lived experiences and social positions. Wyatt et al…”
Scholars are increasingly called to incorporate a justice, equity, diversity and inclusion (JEDI) lens into health professions education (HPE) research. [1][2][3][4][5] These and other terms are described in Table 1 and bolded throughout the paper. The complexity of this work can feel overwhelming, leading researchers at any career stage to avoid it altogether saying, 'what I do is not JEDI research'. The pressure to incorporate JEDI 'correctly' may also dissuade researchers who prefer to 'stay in their lane' of expertise. While these tendencies may be understandable, they present a problem: HPE scholarship may fail to recognise vast ways of being, knowing and doing. Every area of research is steeped in a sociohistorical context and shaped by power dynamics (e.g. racism, ableism, colonialism and hetero/cis/sexism), meaning JEDI concerns are always at play. Research not engaging with these complexities risks ignoring scholars' influence on processes and outcomes, thus omitting diverse perspectives and experiences. 6 Consequently, constructions based on the norm prevail and researchers may, unintentionally, reconstruct knowledge from an exclusionary position. How can you do research in ways that unearth diverse per-
“…For example, in LN and NRJ's research into student mistreatment by patients, the team wrestled with interpretations of data that represented racism and sexism. 20 NRJ and another co-author, who identify as visible minorities, brought rich insights to this data interpretation from their own lived experiences and social positions. Wyatt et al…”
Scholars are increasingly called to incorporate a justice, equity, diversity and inclusion (JEDI) lens into health professions education (HPE) research. [1][2][3][4][5] These and other terms are described in Table 1 and bolded throughout the paper. The complexity of this work can feel overwhelming, leading researchers at any career stage to avoid it altogether saying, 'what I do is not JEDI research'. The pressure to incorporate JEDI 'correctly' may also dissuade researchers who prefer to 'stay in their lane' of expertise. While these tendencies may be understandable, they present a problem: HPE scholarship may fail to recognise vast ways of being, knowing and doing. Every area of research is steeped in a sociohistorical context and shaped by power dynamics (e.g. racism, ableism, colonialism and hetero/cis/sexism), meaning JEDI concerns are always at play. Research not engaging with these complexities risks ignoring scholars' influence on processes and outcomes, thus omitting diverse perspectives and experiences. 6 Consequently, constructions based on the norm prevail and researchers may, unintentionally, reconstruct knowledge from an exclusionary position. How can you do research in ways that unearth diverse per-
“…8,17,18 The formative impact of such interactions on trainees is yet to be fully understood, as noted by Hu et al, but certainly threatens individual and workforce wellbeing. 1 Thus the story of my mother's experience also serves to underscore the importance of safety in the health care and learning environment and also the importance of mutual support, respect, and gentleness amongst colleagues. Reaffirming our commitment to our professional values may go far in restoring trust in the health professions on a societal scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a report 1 appearing in this issue of our journal, Hu et al explore the experience of mistreatment of medical students by patients in the learning environment in a qualitative study involving 14 student volunteers enrolled at a large Canadian medical school. The students describe numerous negative encounters with patients-none of which were formally reported to the administration-in which they were mistreated.…”
conversation about failure. Qualitative exploration of these aspects can offer valuable insights into the nuanced factors contributing to the challenges faced by students. Therefore, we analyzed the reflective essays written by the workshop participants to deepen our understanding of medical students' perceptions of failure, which is indispensable for refining future iterations of the workshop.We appreciate the authors' thoughtful engagement, their encouragement to keep the conversation alive, and their acknowledgment of diverse perspectives on failure. Embracing these differing viewpoints contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the complex dynamics surrounding failure and welcomes a growth mindset in medical education.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.