Exploring Farmers’ Climate Change Perceptions and Adaptation Intentions: Empirical Evidence from Austria

Abstract

The lack of timely adaptation in agriculture may hamper prosperous farm developments by neglecting risks and opportunities emerging from climate change. Understanding farmers’ perceptual and socio-cognitive processes is key in order to encourage on-farm adaptation. We aim at investigating how farmers’ individual cognition on climate change and adaptation as well as socio-environmental context factors affect agricultural adaptation intention and avoidance. We build on the Model of Private Proactive Adaptation to Climate Change (MPPACC) and apply a qualitative interview approach in two Austrian farming regions. Twenty semi-structured interviews have been conducted with 29 farmers. Based on the results of the qualitative content analysis, we have identified four groups of farmers, which differ in the formation process of adaptation intention and avoidance: (i) climate change adaptors, (ii) integrative adaptors, (iii) cost-benefit calculators, and (iv) climate change fatalists. Farmers who are part of groups (i)–(iii) form adaptation intentions, whereas climate change fatalists do not intend to adapt. According to our analysis, adaptation intentions are only formed if farmers are aware of effective adaptation measures, accept personal responsibility for their farms, and evaluate adaptation costs positively (i.e. adaptation appraisal). Farmers’ climate change appraisal as well as farm and regional characteristics are also perceived relevant for farmers’ adaptation decisions but seem to be less important than adaptation appraisal. Therefore, we conclude that engagement strategies and outreach efforts need not only address risks and opportunities, but should also strengthen farmers’ self-responsibility and offer adaptation measures tailored to the regional characteristics and the farmers’ needs.

Premises for Efficient Climatic Risk Management in the Russian Agriculture: an Investment-Innovation

“…Как следствие, эти риски оказываются практически «неощутимыми» (в том числе некорректно интерпретируемыми), что выступает наиболее значимым препятствием на пути управления ими. Исследования в Европе в целом [21], а также в столь разных странах, как Австрия [22], Индия [23], Колумбия [24] и США [25,26], показывают, что фермеры весьма поразному воспринимают климатические риски и даже в случае корректного восприятия вовсе не обязательно демонстрируют готовность адекватно реагировать на них.…”

Management für eine nachhaltige Zukunftsgestaltung

“…Die Ergebnisse unterstützen die quantitative Simulation regionaler Szenarien. In leitfadengestützten Interviews wird das Anpassungsverhalten von Landwirtinnen und Landwirten an die veränderten klimatischen und hydrologischen Rahmenbedingungen erhoben (Mitter et al 2019). Die Ergebnisse zeigen Möglichkeiten auf, wie Klimawandelanpassungen in den Sektoren der Region angeregt werden können.…”

Climate Change, Pesticides and Health: Considering the Risks and Opportunities of Adaptation for Zimbabwean Smallholder Cotton Growers

“…However, for farmers to make adaptation decisions, they may have to perceive climate change impacts on their farming systems. Several studies in different parts of the world have shown that there is a link between farmers’ perceptions and their adaptation actions to climate change [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ].…”