2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring dimensionality of effortful control using hot and cool tasks in a sample of preschool children

Abstract: Effortful control (EC) is an important developmental construct associated with academic performance, socioemotional growth, and psychopathology. EC, defined as the ability to inhibit or delay a prepotent response typically in favor of a subdominant response, undergoes rapid development during children’s preschool years. Research involving EC in preschool children can be aided by ensuring that the measured model of EC matches the latent structure of EC. Extant research indicates that EC may be multidimensional,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(120 reference statements)
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scores on this measure are significantly correlated with reported self-regulation in the classroom, parental reports of attention (Cameron Ponitz et al, 2009; McClelland et al, 2007) and other measures of self-regulation and executive function tasks. The HTKS also loads well onto a self-regulation factor with other similar measures (Allan & Lonigan, 2014). In addition, past evidence indicates that growth in HTKS performance does not appear to be a function of practice effects (Cameron Ponitz et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Scores on this measure are significantly correlated with reported self-regulation in the classroom, parental reports of attention (Cameron Ponitz et al, 2009; McClelland et al, 2007) and other measures of self-regulation and executive function tasks. The HTKS also loads well onto a self-regulation factor with other similar measures (Allan & Lonigan, 2014). In addition, past evidence indicates that growth in HTKS performance does not appear to be a function of practice effects (Cameron Ponitz et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Although the HTKS task has been shown to be a good index of IC (e.g., N. P. Allan & Lonigan, 2011, 2014), future research is needed to determine whether results hold across other measures that are designed to assess IC, as well as other aspects of EF. In addition, the results of this study are correlational, and thus, they cannot be interpreted as causal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal consistency for HTKS is high (α = .93), and scores on HTKS correlate with teachers’ ratings of classroom behavior (Ponitz et al, 2009) and other direct measures of IC (e.g., N. P. Allan & Lonigan, 2011, 2014). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the maximum possible score was 40. Internal consistency for the HTKS is high (α = .93), and scores on the HTKS correlate with teachers’ ratings of classroom behavior (Ponitz, McClelland, Matthews, & Morrison, 2009) and other direct measures of self-regulation (e.g., Allan & Lonigan, 2011; 2014). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%