National Testing in Schools 2015
DOI: 10.4324/9781315659312-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Children’s Lived Experiences of NAPLAN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, mathematical learning experiences that students viewed as boring or irrelevant negatively impacted on attitudes towards mathematics (Philippou & Christou, 1998;Reyes, 1984). Additionally, Howell (2016) reported students in the primary years to have negative attitudes towards mathematical assessment.…”
Section: Pedagogical Practice and Attitudes Towards Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, mathematical learning experiences that students viewed as boring or irrelevant negatively impacted on attitudes towards mathematics (Philippou & Christou, 1998;Reyes, 1984). Additionally, Howell (2016) reported students in the primary years to have negative attitudes towards mathematical assessment.…”
Section: Pedagogical Practice and Attitudes Towards Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Doğan and Sönmez (2019) investigated attitudes towards mathematical games, while Bachman and colleagues (2016) explored attitudes in two different learning areas, mathematics and dance. Howell (2012Howell ( , 2016Howell ( , 2017 investigated attitudes towards standardised testing in Australia. Foley (2016) explored female, primary-aged students' attitudes towards mathematics, and Quane (2021) investigated the influence of peers on students' attitudes towards mathematics.…”
Section: Attitudes Towards Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various disputes about educational provisions and procedures that would previously have been couched in mere technical terms, relating to effectiveness and feasibility, or to important but non-justice-relevant values, are now conceptualised as debates about social justice in education. Those include, to name a few examples, worries about provisions for education (Courtney, 2015), fears that over-emphasis on academic attainment increases stress in the lives of students and reduces their engagement with learning (Howell, 2015;Hutchings et al, 2016;Horgan, 2007;Kulz, 2014) and even disputes over the relative importance of teacher autonomy, professionalism and accountability (Sahlberg, 2011).…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, in addition to the aggregated data sharing as an outcome of the process, the body of research about the impact of NAPLAN on individual students' well-being as participants of the process is increasing, though the lack of voice given to students continues to be a distinguishing feature (Howell, 2015). Furthermore, little research has been undertaken about the journey of participants over a NAPLAN cycle, that is, during the preparation, participation and completion of the assessment, and the period after when results of student performance are received; and explicitly from the perspective of students through their own visual depictions and accompanying words (Swain, Pendergast, & Cumming, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%