2018
DOI: 10.1177/0004944118779602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student voice: Student feelings as they journey through National Assessment (NAPLAN)

Abstract: This study explored students' feelings during the Australian National Assessment Program -Literacy and Numeracy. It features student voice depicted as self-drawn images accompanied by words as they journeyed through four phases of the NAPLAN process: preparation, participation, completion and results. The 34 students in Years 3, 5 and 7 attended one of two Queensland primary schools with divergent approaches to National Assessment Program -Literacy and Numeracy. One-hundred and thirty-six images accompanied by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is important, as the field of educational practice tends to favour silver bullet solutions for literacy concerns, despite research such as this paper demonstrating the diverse causation behind the issues faced by SLLs. Contemporary policymakers in Australia and England favour increased screening and high-stakes testing as ways of solving literacy issues in schools (Marshall 2017;Swain and Pendergast 2018), though such methods of measurement do not in themselves lead to improvement for students, just as "weighing a pig does not make it fatter", and such tests can be ineffective in forming appropriate intervention for struggling students (Glazzard 2017). SLLs in the secondary context may not have a learning difficulty or disability, though this diagnosis is essential to secure supportive funding, at least in the public schooling system in Australia (Australian Government 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important, as the field of educational practice tends to favour silver bullet solutions for literacy concerns, despite research such as this paper demonstrating the diverse causation behind the issues faced by SLLs. Contemporary policymakers in Australia and England favour increased screening and high-stakes testing as ways of solving literacy issues in schools (Marshall 2017;Swain and Pendergast 2018), though such methods of measurement do not in themselves lead to improvement for students, just as "weighing a pig does not make it fatter", and such tests can be ineffective in forming appropriate intervention for struggling students (Glazzard 2017). SLLs in the secondary context may not have a learning difficulty or disability, though this diagnosis is essential to secure supportive funding, at least in the public schooling system in Australia (Australian Government 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fitzgerald et al, 2017) and students feel pressurised to perform in high‐stakes assessments (e.g. Swain & Prendergast, 2018). While these are of course valid concerns in the debate on learning in STEM, our focus in this article is concerned with analogies used to describe learning and the associated philosophical and epistemological perspectives on the practice of teaching and learning in the STEM classroom.…”
Section: An Adaptive Emergent Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure7: What did students learn in the process? Black (2002), Gipps (2003), Wyatt-Smith andCumming (2009), King (2016), Carless (2017) and Swain and Pendergast (2018) all express the importance of assessment in learning new things in their studies. Researchers think that assessment should help to learn instead of just measuring the amount of learning.…”
Section: New Items That Students Learnt In the Processmentioning
confidence: 99%