2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2017.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring adult Playfulness: Examining the accuracy of personality judgments at zero-acquaintance and an LIWC analysis of textual information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
35
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
7
35
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, vector correlation analyses indicated that relationships between self- and peer-ratings of Intellectual playfulness differed from each other independently of whether the outcome was assessed by self- or peer-ratings. In line with previous studies (e.g., Proyer and Brauer, 2018 ; Proyer et al, 2018a ), we argue that the comparatively low observability of Intellectual playfulness contributes to differences in self- and peer-views and the associations toward external variables.…”
Section: Studysupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, vector correlation analyses indicated that relationships between self- and peer-ratings of Intellectual playfulness differed from each other independently of whether the outcome was assessed by self- or peer-ratings. In line with previous studies (e.g., Proyer and Brauer, 2018 ; Proyer et al, 2018a ), we argue that the comparatively low observability of Intellectual playfulness contributes to differences in self- and peer-views and the associations toward external variables.…”
Section: Studysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As expected, self- and peer-ratings for playfulness and the indicators for health, activity, and fitness converged very well. As in previous studies (e.g., Proyer, 2017 ; Proyer and Brauer, 2018 ), playfulness and its facets were accurately perceived by their acquaintances. Thus, it can be concluded that peer-raters can observe playfulness and physical functioning well, and that their perception does not differ strongly from the self-perceptions by the individuals.…”
Section: Studysupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible therefore that our findings are biased by country-level differences in acquiescence bias, leading to an underestimation of the actual differences. However, it must be noted that data on the self-other agreement in playfulness ( Ostendorf et al, 1986 ; Fekken et al, 1987 ; Proyer, 2017 ; Proyer and Brauer, 2018 ) suggest good convergence. Hence, while acquiescence may play a role and should be controlled for, self-ratings seem to reflect the perception of (well) acquainted others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hence, while acquiescence may play a role and should be controlled for, self-ratings seem to reflect the perception of (well) acquainted others. There is even evidence that people can gather information on a person’s playfulness in zero-acquaintance settings ( Proyer and Brauer, 2018 ). Nevertheless, future studies should contain reverse coded items.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%