An Initial Cross-Cultural Comparison of Adult Playfulness in Mainland China and German-Speaking Countries

Abstract

Compared with playfulness in infants and children, playfulness in adults is relatively under-studied. Although there is no empirical research comparing differences in adult playfulness across cultures, one might expect variations between Western and Eastern societies such as China. While playfulness is typically seen as a positive trait in Western culture, there are hints in Chinese culture that being playful has negative connotations (e.g., associations with laziness and seeing play as the opposite of work). The aim of this study was to compare expressions of playfulness in one sample from German-speaking countries (n = 143) and two samples from China (Guangzhou: n = 176; Beijing: n = 100). Participants completed one playfulness scale developed in the West (Short Measure of Adult Playfulness, SMAP) and one from the East (Adult Playfulness Questionnaire, APQ). Additional ratings of the participants were collected to measure: (a) the level of playful behavior expressed by people in different situations (e.g., when being around family members, in public, or on social media), and (b) individuals’ perceptions of society’s expectations concerning the appropriateness of being playful in the given situations. Overall, the results of the comparisons were mixed. Although SMAP scores did not vary significantly across the three samples, people from German-speaking countries tended to score higher on some facets of the APQ and some situational ratings. Stronger effects were found when comparing only the German-speaking sample and the Guangzhou sample. In addition to the cross-cultural differences that we expected, we also detected Chinese regional variations (North vs. South). We conclude that societal rules and cultural factors may impact expressions of playfulness in a society.

Measurement invariance of the ICT engagement construct and its association with students’ performance in China and Germany: Evidence from PISA 2015 data

“…This interrelatedness causes them to take serious consideration of their parents’ and teachers’ expectations. The students also feel that they need to try to do their best work because of the intense competition in the Chinese education system (Pang & Proyer, ). In such a cultural environment, developing personal ICT interests must serve test‐oriented goals.…”

How Playfulness Motivates – Putative Looping Effects of Autonomy and Surprise Revealed by Micro-Phenomenological Investigations

“…Secondly, Lieberman (1965 , 1966 ) was one of the first to shift attention from the activity to the participant , thus attempting to define playfulness as a character trait, with sub-traits such as cognitive spontaneity, physical spontaneity, social spontaneity, manifest joy and sense of humor (for recent work on this see Glynn and Webster, 1992 ; Proyer, 2012 ; Shen et al, 2014 ; see also Barnett, 2017 for a culture comparative approach).…”

Understanding the evaluation of mHealth app features based on a cross-country Kano analysis

“…While the results of the first three characteristics support the hypotheses, the significant difference regarding adult playfulness is revealing. It may be considered a complement to international adult playfulness and gamification research (Pang & Proyer, 2018 ).…”

“…In the only available cross-country study on adult playfulness, Pang and Proyer ( 2018 ) concluded that societal rules and cultural factors might affect playfulness in a society. Anecdotal evidence suggests the Danish culture is more liberal and progressive than many other cultures, including the German culture (Allen, 2012 ; Hoefler & Vejlgaard, 2011 ; Jensen, 2017 ).…”