2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2015.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring activity differences between the hydroformylation catalysts: Insights from theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was ensured that the obtained transition state structures possessed only one imaginary frequency corresponding to the correct normal mode. The translational entropy term in the calculated structures was corrected through a free volume correction introduced by Mammen et al This procedure of correcting the translational entropy term has also been followed by other groups …”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was ensured that the obtained transition state structures possessed only one imaginary frequency corresponding to the correct normal mode. The translational entropy term in the calculated structures was corrected through a free volume correction introduced by Mammen et al This procedure of correcting the translational entropy term has also been followed by other groups …”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a reasonable assumption as a real transition state with a much higher energy than the reactants is often improbable for coordination reactions. Moreover, such reactions are generally considered to be nonactivated. , , Although a small activation energy is possible for ethylene coordination on certain catalysts, DFT calculations have indicated that the reaction is essentially nonactivated on a PPh 3 -modified Rh catalyst . Additionally, it is beneficial to assume the coordination reactions are nonactivated when the activation energy can be expected to be very small in order to reduce the total number of parameters and lead to a more accurate estimation of the other parameters.…”
Section: Kinetic Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coordination number can also impact the hydroformylation activity. , The addition of excessive amounts of phosphine ligands can experimentally inhibit the hydroformylation of formaldehyde, indicating that the coordination number of phosphine ligands indeed delivers an effect on the reaction outcomes. , The comparison of the difference between mono- and bisubstituted PPh 3 ligands in the olefin hydroformylation showed the energy barrier of the single coordination reaction (24.5 kcal/mol) was lower than that of the double coordination reaction (28.9 kcal/mol) . van Leeuwen et al explored the influence of 12 bidentate ligands on the hydroformylation reaction and proposed that the product selectivity was dominated by the electronic properties of ligands, while the spatial properties showed less influence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%