2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c07258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Insight into the Ligand Effect on the Original Activity of Rh-Catalyzed Formaldehyde Hydroformylation

Abstract: This study performs a computational examination of the effect of the ligand nature on the Rh–L interaction and of the formaldehyde hydroformylation for substituted rhodium–carbonyl catalysts using a range of realistic mono- and bidentate ligands (CO, P­(OMe)3, PPh3, DMI, and DPPE). The energy decomposition analysis of the Rh–L bond suggests the bidentate ligand, DPPE, shows the strongest interaction with Rh. The π-accepting capacity of monodentate ligands follows the sequence CO > P­(OMe)3 > PPh3 > DMI. Analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We attempt to explore the origin of the activity difference further from the perspective of hydroformylation reaction mechanism using theoretical calculation. Since both mono‐ and di‐substituted Rh‐complexes are active species [18] and there is no significant difference in the major species’ energies [19] , herein the monosubstituted Rh species (HRh(CO) 3 L) was employed as the standard. The ligands, PPh 3 (L1) and P( p PhCF 3 ) 3 (L4), were chosen as representatives based on the fact that the TOF of L1 is nearly twice that of L4 with similar selectivity (Table S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We attempt to explore the origin of the activity difference further from the perspective of hydroformylation reaction mechanism using theoretical calculation. Since both mono‐ and di‐substituted Rh‐complexes are active species [18] and there is no significant difference in the major species’ energies [19] , herein the monosubstituted Rh species (HRh(CO) 3 L) was employed as the standard. The ligands, PPh 3 (L1) and P( p PhCF 3 ) 3 (L4), were chosen as representatives based on the fact that the TOF of L1 is nearly twice that of L4 with similar selectivity (Table S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydridocarbonyl complexes, which are active in hydroformylation, are formed in situ under the reaction conditions, while the initial Rh or Co complexes act only as precursors. Ligands play a key role in the properties of resulting active species, and thus, the development of improved catalysts requires a thorough understanding of the correlations between the ligand structure and the catalytic performance. For a deeper understanding of the process, in situ methods are much more informative compared with the spectroscopic studies of the precursors or the starting solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, because of EG has a limited manufacturing capacity, it has a large market potential. From the market demand statistics 2, the global demand and consumption for EG will continue to grow in the upcoming decades. To meet this demand, the EG production process has been improvised in terms of reactants used, reaction kinetics, and mechanisms as well as catalyst selection by many researchers 3–7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%