Abstract:Sexual self-disclosure is a critical component of relationship and sexual satisfaction, yet little is known about the mechanisms that facilitate a person's engagement in sexual self-disclosure. Individuals (N = 265) involved in romantic relationships participated in an online study testing a contextual model of sexual self-disclosure across three contexts: relationship context, sexual self-disclosure context, and outcome of sexual self-disclosure. Results suggest that sexual satisfaction was predicted by a pos… Show more
“…Given the large effect size of prolonged exposure in clinical research (Powers et al, 2010), perhaps the process of gradual exposure is a driver of kink-related coping with distress beyond trauma. Additionally, the prominence of cultural context within the present study aligns with the emphasis on contextual determinants of sexual behaviors that is gaining traction in sex research (R. D. Brown & Weigel, 2018;Wignall & McCormack, 2017). While individual differences and dispositional attributes are important levels of analysis, without the contextual substrate identified by participants in the present model, it is unclear whether kink would have emerged as transformative.…”
Bondage/discipline, dominance/submission, and sadism/masochism (BDSM; "kink") are frequently pathologized as derivatives of abuse. Although the link is unsubstantiated, some kink-identified people who happen to be survivors of trauma may engage in kink, or trauma play, to heal from, cope with, and transform childhood abuse or adolescent maltreatment. The present study sought a thematic model (Braun & Clarke, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101, 2006) of trauma recovery through kink using a critical realist, inductive approach to inquiry. Participants were eligible if they had experienced early abuse, were adults, and practiced kink. Six superordinate themes were generated from semi-structured interviews with 20 participants from five countries: cultural context of healing (e.g. using BDSM norms and previous therapy to reframe kink and trauma), restructuring the self-concept (e.g. strengthening internal characteristics which had been harmed or distorted), liberation through relationship (e.g. learning to be valued by intimate others), reclaiming power (e.g. setting and maintaining personal boundaries), repurposing behaviors (e.g. engaging in aspects of prolonged exposure), and redefining pain (e.g. transcending painful memories through masochism). Notably, participants only reported retraumatizing experiences prior to learning about the structural safeguards of BDSM. Research and clinical implications are discussed by drawing on general models of trauma recovery.
“…Given the large effect size of prolonged exposure in clinical research (Powers et al, 2010), perhaps the process of gradual exposure is a driver of kink-related coping with distress beyond trauma. Additionally, the prominence of cultural context within the present study aligns with the emphasis on contextual determinants of sexual behaviors that is gaining traction in sex research (R. D. Brown & Weigel, 2018;Wignall & McCormack, 2017). While individual differences and dispositional attributes are important levels of analysis, without the contextual substrate identified by participants in the present model, it is unclear whether kink would have emerged as transformative.…”
Bondage/discipline, dominance/submission, and sadism/masochism (BDSM; "kink") are frequently pathologized as derivatives of abuse. Although the link is unsubstantiated, some kink-identified people who happen to be survivors of trauma may engage in kink, or trauma play, to heal from, cope with, and transform childhood abuse or adolescent maltreatment. The present study sought a thematic model (Braun & Clarke, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101, 2006) of trauma recovery through kink using a critical realist, inductive approach to inquiry. Participants were eligible if they had experienced early abuse, were adults, and practiced kink. Six superordinate themes were generated from semi-structured interviews with 20 participants from five countries: cultural context of healing (e.g. using BDSM norms and previous therapy to reframe kink and trauma), restructuring the self-concept (e.g. strengthening internal characteristics which had been harmed or distorted), liberation through relationship (e.g. learning to be valued by intimate others), reclaiming power (e.g. setting and maintaining personal boundaries), repurposing behaviors (e.g. engaging in aspects of prolonged exposure), and redefining pain (e.g. transcending painful memories through masochism). Notably, participants only reported retraumatizing experiences prior to learning about the structural safeguards of BDSM. Research and clinical implications are discussed by drawing on general models of trauma recovery.
“…The model explicates several pathways, grounded in affectionate exchange theory, that help explain who is most likely to engage in communication during sexual activity and the links between such communication and sexual and relational well-being. Importantly, the model provides a needed addition to theoretical models of sexual communication, which up until this point have focused on either communication outside of the sexual episode (e.g., the Contextual Model of Sexual Self-Disclosure and Sexual Satisfaction; Brown & Weigel, 2018) or following sexual activity (e.g., the Post Sex Disclosures Model; Denes, 2018). By finding support for most of the model pathways, researchers can continue to test, expand, and refine the model to better understand partners’ talk during sexual activity and, more broadly, the role of communication in intimate contexts.…”
Preliminary evidence suggests that communication during and after sexual activity is linked to positive sexual and relational assessments, but the process of communication during sexual activity (i.e., predictors and outcomes of such behavior) has yet to be explicated. As such, the current study puts forth the Communication During Sexual Activity model, which posits that one’s propensity for affectionate communication, sexual self-esteem, and sexual assertiveness predict verbal communication during sexual activity, which in turn is associated with sexual and relationship satisfaction. Within a sample of emerging adults, structural equation modeling revealed that sexual self-esteem and trait affection were positively associated with communication during sexual activity. However, sexual assertiveness did not significantly predict communication during sexual activity. Communication during sexual activity was also positively associated with sexual satisfaction, and indirectly associated with relationship satisfaction through sexual satisfaction. The implications of the findings for future sexual communication research and interventions are addressed.
“…Within the limits of the current research, relationship satisfaction appeared complex and robust enough as a starting point for a variable for a relationship intervention with transgender and genderqueer couples. In studies with cisgender heterosexual relationship satisfaction correlated positively with mental health, physical health (Robles et al, 2014), relationship longevity (Graham et al, 2011), stronger friendship (Julien et al, 2003;Mackey et al, 2004), emotional intimacy,sexual intimacy (Brown & Weigel, 2017;Yoo, Bartle-Haring, Day, & Gangamma, 2014), empathy, humor, and affection (Gottman et al, 2003). Relationship satisfaction correlated negatively with contempt, disgust, and defensiveness (Gottman et al, 2003).…”
Researchers worked with transgender couples and the Marriage Checkup (MC) using single subject, non-concurrent, multiple-baseline, multiple-probe design. The MC was selected for its basis in motivational interviewing. Visual analysis and effect size (NAP .87) showed the MC positively influenced satisfaction, suggesting the MC may increase satisfaction for transgender couples.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.