The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2017
DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1295299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring a Contextual Model of Sexual Self-Disclosure and Sexual Satisfaction

Abstract: Sexual self-disclosure is a critical component of relationship and sexual satisfaction, yet little is known about the mechanisms that facilitate a person's engagement in sexual self-disclosure. Individuals (N = 265) involved in romantic relationships participated in an online study testing a contextual model of sexual self-disclosure across three contexts: relationship context, sexual self-disclosure context, and outcome of sexual self-disclosure. Results suggest that sexual satisfaction was predicted by a pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the large effect size of prolonged exposure in clinical research (Powers et al, 2010), perhaps the process of gradual exposure is a driver of kink-related coping with distress beyond trauma. Additionally, the prominence of cultural context within the present study aligns with the emphasis on contextual determinants of sexual behaviors that is gaining traction in sex research (R. D. Brown & Weigel, 2018;Wignall & McCormack, 2017). While individual differences and dispositional attributes are important levels of analysis, without the contextual substrate identified by participants in the present model, it is unclear whether kink would have emerged as transformative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Given the large effect size of prolonged exposure in clinical research (Powers et al, 2010), perhaps the process of gradual exposure is a driver of kink-related coping with distress beyond trauma. Additionally, the prominence of cultural context within the present study aligns with the emphasis on contextual determinants of sexual behaviors that is gaining traction in sex research (R. D. Brown & Weigel, 2018;Wignall & McCormack, 2017). While individual differences and dispositional attributes are important levels of analysis, without the contextual substrate identified by participants in the present model, it is unclear whether kink would have emerged as transformative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The model explicates several pathways, grounded in affectionate exchange theory, that help explain who is most likely to engage in communication during sexual activity and the links between such communication and sexual and relational well-being. Importantly, the model provides a needed addition to theoretical models of sexual communication, which up until this point have focused on either communication outside of the sexual episode (e.g., the Contextual Model of Sexual Self-Disclosure and Sexual Satisfaction; Brown & Weigel, 2018) or following sexual activity (e.g., the Post Sex Disclosures Model; Denes, 2018). By finding support for most of the model pathways, researchers can continue to test, expand, and refine the model to better understand partners’ talk during sexual activity and, more broadly, the role of communication in intimate contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the limits of the current research, relationship satisfaction appeared complex and robust enough as a starting point for a variable for a relationship intervention with transgender and genderqueer couples. In studies with cisgender heterosexual relationship satisfaction correlated positively with mental health, physical health (Robles et al, 2014), relationship longevity (Graham et al, 2011), stronger friendship (Julien et al, 2003;Mackey et al, 2004), emotional intimacy,sexual intimacy (Brown & Weigel, 2017;Yoo, Bartle-Haring, Day, & Gangamma, 2014), empathy, humor, and affection (Gottman et al, 2003). Relationship satisfaction correlated negatively with contempt, disgust, and defensiveness (Gottman et al, 2003).…”
Section: Relationship Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%