2017
DOI: 10.1080/17543266.2016.1278465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explore consumer needs and design purposes of smart clothing from designers’ perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the footwear will provide assistive information to the wearers to support their independence. In line with research by Perry and colleagues, we argue that an approach driven by user needs is required to improve smart product development and future acceptance and commercialisation (Perry, Malinin, Sanders, Li, & Leigh, 2017). The research sought to explore the perspectives of older adults and understand their underlying needs and preferences in terms of style, colour, material, and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As a result, the footwear will provide assistive information to the wearers to support their independence. In line with research by Perry and colleagues, we argue that an approach driven by user needs is required to improve smart product development and future acceptance and commercialisation (Perry, Malinin, Sanders, Li, & Leigh, 2017). The research sought to explore the perspectives of older adults and understand their underlying needs and preferences in terms of style, colour, material, and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Due to the novelty of smart interactive textiles, the research landscape on the acceptance of smart interactive textiles still has many blind spots. Perry [ 24 ] studied the consumer’s needs and purposes for smart clothing. In general, the study revealed a high consumer interest in smart clothing, but the study also revealed conflicting design goals: For designers, it is most important that smart clothes are affordable, fashionable, and enjoyable, whereas they believe consumers to consider function, no technical problems, and affordability as the most important criteria.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different from the proposed positive relationship, perceived comfort (β = -.10) negatively influenced purchase intention. The reason might be because smart clothing, which is embedded with electronics, was perceived as not comfortable (Perry, Malinin, Sanders, Li, & Leigh, 2017).…”
Section: Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%