2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploratory procedures of tactile images in visually impaired and blindfolded sighted children: How they relate to their consequent performance in drawing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be argued that the exploratory procedures developed with age by blind children are less efficient than those developed by sighted children, with the result that the former collect only partial information for a longer period of time. However, in a recent study, it was found that children aged 7 years or 11 years with a visual handicap outperformed age‐matched sighted children in the haptic exploration of bidimensional tactile images (Vinter, Fernandes, Orlandi, & Morgan, ). The stronger dominance of local processing in blind children is therefore unlikely to be due to potential deficits in peripheral information‐gathering activities as compared to sighted children, although we cannot totally rule out this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It could be argued that the exploratory procedures developed with age by blind children are less efficient than those developed by sighted children, with the result that the former collect only partial information for a longer period of time. However, in a recent study, it was found that children aged 7 years or 11 years with a visual handicap outperformed age‐matched sighted children in the haptic exploration of bidimensional tactile images (Vinter, Fernandes, Orlandi, & Morgan, ). The stronger dominance of local processing in blind children is therefore unlikely to be due to potential deficits in peripheral information‐gathering activities as compared to sighted children, although we cannot totally rule out this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Besides the known applications of tactile sensory substitutions such as the Braille alphabet, white cane, or the TDU, our results open new avenues for mitigation of deficiencies of spatial functions in the blind and visually impaired. Indeed, it has been demonstrated numerous times that tactile information can support spatial functions in blind, visually impaired, and sighted subjects (Marmor and Zaback, 1976; Carpenter and Eisenberg, 1978; Grant et al, 2000; Ptito et al, 2005; Sathian, 2005; Chebat et al, 2007; Wan et al, 2010; Rovira et al, 2011; Vinter et al, 2012). However, the main innovation introduced by our study is the digital simulated nature of the tactile stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, bimanual exploration allows one to relate hand locations to the body axis, and this provides an effective frame of reference for coding bilateral features of objects (see also Millar, 1978). Moreover, bimanual exploration has been found to benefit performance also in tasks requiring blindfolded sighted participants to recognize tactile images of familiar objects (Wijntjes, van Lienen, Verstijnen, & Kappers, 2008) and in shape discrimination or drawing tasks tested in both sighted and blind individuals (e.g., Russier, 1999, Vinter, Fernandes, Orlandi, & Morgan, 2012). Previous evidence has shown that the blind tend to employ both hands and use multiple strategies in haptic recognition more often than do their sighted peers (Rovira, Deschamps, & Baena-Gomez, 2011; see also Heller, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%