Exploration of veterinary shortages in the wake of the Veterinary Feed Directive

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To identify geographic areas in the United States where food animal veterinary services may be insufficient to meet increased needs associated with the US FDA's Veterinary Feed Directive. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SAMPLE Data collected between 2010 and 2016 from the US Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment Program, the National Animal Health Monitoring System Small-Scale US Livestock Operations Study, and the USDA's National Veterinary Accreditation Program. PROCEDURES Each dataset was analyzed separately to identify geographic areas with greatest potential for veterinary shortages. Geographic information systems methods were used to identify co-occurrence among the datasets of counties with veterinary shortages. RESULTS Analysis of the loan repayment program, Small-Scale Livestock Operations Study, and veterinary accreditation datasets revealed veterinary shortages in 314, 346, and 117 counties, respectively. Of the 3,140 counties in the United States during the study period, 728 (23.2%) counties were identified as veterinary shortage areas in at least 1 dataset. Specifically, 680 counties were identified as shortage areas in 1 dataset, 47 as shortage areas in 2 datasets, and 1 Arizona county as a shortage area in all 3 datasets. Arizona, Kentucky, Missouri, South Dakota, and Virginia had ≥ 3 counties identified as shortage areas in ≥ 2 datasets. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Many geographic areas were identified across the United States where food animal veterinary services may be inadequate to implement the Veterinary Feed Directive and meet other producer needs. This information can be used to assess the impact of federal regulations and programs and help understand the factors that influence access to food animal veterinary services in specific geographic areas.

Multicenter study of uterine tears and other reproductive complications in periparturient goats presented to veterinary teaching hospitals

“…Because of this increased popularity, as well as a shortage of available ruminant veterinarians, goats often are presented to university veterinary hospitals for the treatment of periparturient conditions, such as pregnancy toxemia and dystocia. 2,3 The incidence of dystocia in small ruminants has been reported to range from 2.5% to 3.1%, although these rates were determined in small numbers of sheep and a recent incidence in goats has not been reported. 4,5 Despite the frequency of presentation of reproductive emergencies to university veterinary hospitals, little information is available regarding the frequency of and risk factors for periparturient reproductive complications in goats.…”

“…Consequently, there is increased demand for veterinary services, improved veterinary care, and improved survival rates. Because of this increased popularity, as well as a shortage of available ruminant veterinarians, goats often are presented to university veterinary hospitals for the treatment of periparturient conditions, such as pregnancy toxemia and dystocia 2,3 . The incidence of dystocia in small ruminants has been reported to range from 2.5% to 3.1%, although these rates were determined in small numbers of sheep and a recent incidence in goats has not been reported 4,5 .…”