2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-019-00783-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of Multiparameter Hematoma 3D Image Analysis for Predicting Outcome After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…F2 seems to re ect the transition from normal lung densities to extended ground glass opaci cations (about-800HU to -600HU) and it was not a signi cant predictor of critically ill status (AUC: 0.53, P:0.60). In this study, the overall results using FPCA are consistent with previous ones for pulmonary disease subtyping 18,19 or patient neurologic outcome prediction 20 con rming the value of the FPCA method: rst as a non-speci c data driven exploration tool, it offers interpretable modes of variations of the CT histograms in the patient whole cohort. Second, it is a generic method giving accurate predictors related to histogram variations without a priori knowledge or delicate radiomic high dimensional parameter selection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…F2 seems to re ect the transition from normal lung densities to extended ground glass opaci cations (about-800HU to -600HU) and it was not a signi cant predictor of critically ill status (AUC: 0.53, P:0.60). In this study, the overall results using FPCA are consistent with previous ones for pulmonary disease subtyping 18,19 or patient neurologic outcome prediction 20 con rming the value of the FPCA method: rst as a non-speci c data driven exploration tool, it offers interpretable modes of variations of the CT histograms in the patient whole cohort. Second, it is a generic method giving accurate predictors related to histogram variations without a priori knowledge or delicate radiomic high dimensional parameter selection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Selection of features was based on their individual ROC-AUC performance in the full dataset for nodule classification into both 1) H1 or H2 vs H3 and 2) H1 vs H2 or H3. Then, a confounder plot was computed using the R-library “Clumix” 45 , as previously described 46 . Built on a distinct approach that relies on variable similarity (see Supplementary Information Online), the confounder plot shows each feature based on its correlation with the response (H1, H2, H3 nodule class) and on its correlation with a reference feature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we used the ABC/2 method to measure hematoma volume. While some studies support its use, there is some evidence suggesting this method is not as accurate as volumetric or planimetric measurement methods [25,26]. The FDA revoked emergency use of Hydroxychloroquine, after our study period.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 85%