2016
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arw119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration is dependent on reproductive state, not social state, in a cooperatively breeding bird

Abstract: Lay SummaryAn individual’s circumstances or properties—also known as state—maybe a mechanism encouraging behavioral differences among individuals. We investigated whether exploration was associated with social state or reproductive state (i.e., insect abundance at year of birth) in a wild cooperative breeder. We found fast novel object exploration was associated with young individuals born into years of high insect abundance (i.e., low future reproductive state), suggesting this behavior is reproductive state-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These social niches, such as breeding roles, cause individuals to behave differently (although the direction of the relationship is still unclear) and encourages behavioural consistency due to social conflict and the costs incurred by changing social niches ( Bergmüller and Taborsky 2010 ). Although we have shown that social status (primary or non-primary) is not a mechanism that generates and maintains these individual differences in the Seychelles warbler, we have shown that exploration of a novel object is reproductive state-dependent, whereby young individuals with low future reproductive potential exhibited fast exploratory behaviour ( Edwards et al 2016 ). Exploratory behavioural variation may therefore be generated and maintained by reproductive tactics that are modified to suit environmental conditions ( Hammers et al 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These social niches, such as breeding roles, cause individuals to behave differently (although the direction of the relationship is still unclear) and encourages behavioural consistency due to social conflict and the costs incurred by changing social niches ( Bergmüller and Taborsky 2010 ). Although we have shown that social status (primary or non-primary) is not a mechanism that generates and maintains these individual differences in the Seychelles warbler, we have shown that exploration of a novel object is reproductive state-dependent, whereby young individuals with low future reproductive potential exhibited fast exploratory behaviour ( Edwards et al 2016 ). Exploratory behavioural variation may therefore be generated and maintained by reproductive tactics that are modified to suit environmental conditions ( Hammers et al 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…When behaviour is dependent on asset protection, individuals with a high future reproductive state (i.e., individuals that invest in future reproduction or receive reproductive benefits in the future) are predicted to be consistently slow explorers and averse to risk, in order to reduce their risk of mortality, from predation compared with those that have a low future reproductive state ( Dall et al 2004 ; Stamps 2007 ; Wolf et al 2007 ). For example, in the cooperatively-breeding Seychelles warbler, there is a correlation between personality and asset protection ( Edwards et al 2016 ). Furthermore, there is also the potential for personality to be dependent on social state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We found that aggression was positively correlated with contest success ( table 1 ), but none of the behavioural responses in the NA assay covaried with aggression ( table 3 ). Of our other personality measures, exploration is sometimes, and sometimes not, found to covary with the outcome of social interactions in male fowl [ 33 , 47 ], which could indicate that exploration has a rather weak effect on the establishment of social dominance, and that it only matters when contestants are closely matched for other important traits such as aggression and comb size (as a comparison, a correlational study found that social status was not associated with exploration in a cooperatively breeding warbler, Acrocephalus sechellensis , [ 48 ]). Closer examination of the circumstances under which exploration influences contest success is needed before firm conclusions about this relationship can be drawn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%