2021
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.201213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of social experience, aggressiveness and comb size on contest success in male domestic fowl

Abstract: The ability to dominate conspecifics and thereby gain access to resources depends on a number of traits and skills. Experience of dominance relationships during development is a potential source of learning such skills. We here study the importance of social experience, aggressiveness and morphological traits for competitiveness in social interactions (contest success) in male domestic fowl ( Gallus gallus domesticus ). We let males grow up either as a single (dominant) male or as an in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In male junglefowl, winner and loser effects appear to have only a weak influence on dominance hierarchy formation, whereas genetic or developmental variation in aggressiveness is more important and shows consistency over time (Favati et al 2017(Favati et al , 2021Pizzari and McDonald 2019). These observations would agree with our results, provided that the distribution of acquired resources has roughly a linear shape.…”
Section: Consistent Behavioursupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In male junglefowl, winner and loser effects appear to have only a weak influence on dominance hierarchy formation, whereas genetic or developmental variation in aggressiveness is more important and shows consistency over time (Favati et al 2017(Favati et al , 2021Pizzari and McDonald 2019). These observations would agree with our results, provided that the distribution of acquired resources has roughly a linear shape.…”
Section: Consistent Behavioursupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although a wealth of literature has demonstrated how disparities in size can determine the outcome of agonistic interactions and therefore represent good proxies for RHP ( Briffa 2008 , 2013 ; Chamorro-Florescano et al 2011 ) it is by no means the only or the most important RHP determinant. Factors including skill ( Briffa and Lane 2017 ), aggression ( Favati et al 2021 ), physiological traits ( Briffa and Sneddon 2007 ), and personality ( Rudin and Briffa 2012 ) can all contribute to an individual’s RHP. Furthermore, some of these RHP components can vary significantly between the sexes and independently of size, as is the case for aggression in stalk-eyed flies ( Teleopsis dalmanni : Bubak et al 2016 ; Bubak et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the well-documented effects of social isolation across taxa ( Gerall et al 1967 ; Kim and Ehrman 1998 ; Cacioppo and Hawkley 2009 ), prior studies that experimentally manipulate social experience largely assess its influence using simple mating and behavioral assays on either individual behavior or dyadic interactions ( Sakata et al 2002 ; Arnold and Taborsky 2010 ; Guevara-Fiore 2012 ; Řežucha and Reichard 2014 ; Lehtonen et al 2016 ; Favati et al 2021 ). While highly informative, these approaches do not reflect the full range of social and environmental pressures that most animals face under natural settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%