2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting volumetric effects in novel additively manufactured open solar receivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is attributed to an improved volumetric absorption due to higher radiative penetration depth and lower re‐radiation losses at the front. The same trend was observed for solar receivers that feature a porosity gradient . The lowest backside temperature was reached by the v‐groove structure, partly because a large portion of the radiation (44%) is already attenuated at the front (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is attributed to an improved volumetric absorption due to higher radiative penetration depth and lower re‐radiation losses at the front. The same trend was observed for solar receivers that feature a porosity gradient . The lowest backside temperature was reached by the v‐groove structure, partly because a large portion of the radiation (44%) is already attenuated at the front (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Volumetric absorption of concentrated solar radiation using ceramic receivers has been intensively investigated . Of special interest are structures featuring a porosity gradient obtained, e.g., by composites with different pore dimensions, by introducing spikes, and more recently by hierarchically layered fractal‐like structures . The latter was fabricated by the additive manufacturing technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This low temperature in front of the receiver reduces losses of radiative emission to the environment [13]. However only some VR have shown the presence of this effect in particular conditions [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foams used as atmospheric air solar receivers present a major drawback, they absorb the solar flux in the first part of their depth (5 to 10 %), not exploiting the full potential of the specific surface area they offer. Nevertheless, some experimental [27] and numerical studies tend to demonstrate that the volumetric effect may be possible to achieve, but important geometric or physical considerations have to be taken into account [25,26,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%