1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf01531266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting the normative aspect of preference: A deontic logic without actions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Logicians have defined two main approaches to handle this problem. The first follows a practical reasoning approach which defines two basic models on obligations: a conflict-tolerant model [9] and prima-facie obligations [65]. The alternative is to follow a more mainstream formal approach similar to preference-based dyadic obligations approach suggested by [76].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Logicians have defined two main approaches to handle this problem. The first follows a practical reasoning approach which defines two basic models on obligations: a conflict-tolerant model [9] and prima-facie obligations [65]. The alternative is to follow a more mainstream formal approach similar to preference-based dyadic obligations approach suggested by [76].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we only specify the usage and informal meaning for each of the predicates in our communication language. Due to space restrictions, the detailed formal semantics of the language are presented as a separate technical report[36] 9. Please note that even though the two locutions L1 and L2 have a similar syntax, they have different usage, pre-conditions, and effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%