2022
DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting the advantages of a wireless seed localization system that differentiates between the seeds: Breast cancer resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Abstract: Background Most wireless localization methods utilize only one means of detection for the surgeon, sufficient to localize a single small breast lesion for excision. Complex cases requiring bracketing of a larger lesion or localization of two or more close lesions can superimpose the signal from separate “seeds” with such methods. The lack of discernment between the localization “seeds” can disorient the surgeon, risking a missed lesion on excision and longer operative times. with the use of neoadj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of this outcome measure becomes even more apparent in light of the increasing number of technologies that are currently being investigated for the purpose of breast tumor localization. These techniques include magnetic and paramagnetic localization (Magseed [28][29][30][31], Sirius Pintuition [32,33], MOLLI [34], TAKUMI [35]), radiofrequency reflector-based localization (SAVI SCOUT [36][37][38]), radiofrequency identification tags (LO-Calizer [39][40][41]), EnVisio [42]), and stereotactic marking using a carbon suspension [43][44][45]. Due to the lack of solid evidence with regard to clinical effectiveness, none of these investigated techniques have widespread adoption [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of this outcome measure becomes even more apparent in light of the increasing number of technologies that are currently being investigated for the purpose of breast tumor localization. These techniques include magnetic and paramagnetic localization (Magseed [28][29][30][31], Sirius Pintuition [32,33], MOLLI [34], TAKUMI [35]), radiofrequency reflector-based localization (SAVI SCOUT [36][37][38]), radiofrequency identification tags (LO-Calizer [39][40][41]), EnVisio [42]), and stereotactic marking using a carbon suspension [43][44][45]. Due to the lack of solid evidence with regard to clinical effectiveness, none of these investigated techniques have widespread adoption [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%