2016
DOI: 10.4314/acsj.v24i4.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploitation of genetic potential of sweetpotato for end-user traits improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hasil perhitungan nilai KKF dan KKG pada penelitian ini menunjukkan nilai KKF lebih besar dari nilai KKG dengan perbedaan nilai sangat kecil pada hampir semua karakter yang diamati, kecuali pada diameter sulur yang mempunyai nilai KKF dan KKG sama. Menurut Acquaah (2012) dan Baafi et al (2016), hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa keragaman yang terdapat pada aksesi ubi jalar juga dipengaruhi oleh faktor lingkungan selain oleh faktor genetik. Bisne et al (2009), Akinwale et al (2010), Hapsari dan Adie (2010)menambahkan perbedaan nilai yang sangat kecil antara KKF dan KKG menunjukkan bahwa faktor genetik lebih berperan dalam keragaman karakter-karakter tersebut.…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified
“…Hasil perhitungan nilai KKF dan KKG pada penelitian ini menunjukkan nilai KKF lebih besar dari nilai KKG dengan perbedaan nilai sangat kecil pada hampir semua karakter yang diamati, kecuali pada diameter sulur yang mempunyai nilai KKF dan KKG sama. Menurut Acquaah (2012) dan Baafi et al (2016), hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa keragaman yang terdapat pada aksesi ubi jalar juga dipengaruhi oleh faktor lingkungan selain oleh faktor genetik. Bisne et al (2009), Akinwale et al (2010), Hapsari dan Adie (2010)menambahkan perbedaan nilai yang sangat kecil antara KKF dan KKG menunjukkan bahwa faktor genetik lebih berperan dalam keragaman karakter-karakter tersebut.…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified
“…The results of this study also showed that CVp values of all vegetative characters were higher than the CVg values. The value of phenotypic coefficient variation (CVp) that were greatly different from CVg indicated that environmental conditions affected the diversity of sweet potato clones,as also reported by Baafi et al (2016) and Denton & Nwangburuka (2011). Other reports also confirmed higher CVp values than CVg values (Baafi et al, 2016;Denton & Nwangburuka, 2011;El Gendy & Samaa-Abd Khalik, 2014;Wera, Yalu, Ramakrishna, & Deros, 2015).…”
Section: Genetic Performance Based On Vegetative Characters Under Water Stressmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The value of phenotypic coefficient variation (CVp) that were greatly different from CVg indicated that environmental conditions affected the diversity of sweet potato clones,as also reported by Baafi et al (2016) and Denton & Nwangburuka (2011). Other reports also confirmed higher CVp values than CVg values (Baafi et al, 2016;Denton & Nwangburuka, 2011;El Gendy & Samaa-Abd Khalik, 2014;Wera, Yalu, Ramakrishna, & Deros, 2015). However, El Gendy & Samaa-Abd Khalik (2014) obtained a small difference between CVg and CVp in several characters of sweetpotato indicating that the environment had a limited effect on the characters.…”
Section: Genetic Performance Based On Vegetative Characters Under Water Stressmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phenotypic coefficients of variation values were higher than genotypic coefficient of variation values with slight difference values for all the observed characters. Akinwale et al, (2010) and Baafi et al, (2016) stated that the diversity is also influenced by environmental factors besides the genetic factors. The slight difference in value between PCV and GCV shows that the influence of genetic factors is more dominant than the influence of environmental factors.…”
Section: Estimation Of Genetic Variance Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%