The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1093/socpro/spu003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit and Hidden Racial Bias in the Framing of Social Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a smaller body of work, researchers have sought to move beyond fear to consider the connection between media consumption and several nonaffective reactions to crime, including ratings of crime seriousness (Gebotys, Roberts, and DasGupta, 1988), assessments of the potential for victimization (Callanan, 2012), the perception that crime is rising (Pfeiffer, Windzio, and Kleimann, 2005), and support for various crime policies (Britto and Noga-Styron, 2014;Grabe and Drew, 2007;Holbert, Shah, and Kwak, 2004;Kleck and Jackson, 2017;Kort-Butler and Sittner Hartshorn, 2011). In building on this work, we examine the potential influence of the media on the framing of crime as a social problem (e.g., Drakulich, 2015a). In particular, we consider a set of interrelated frames, including both perceptions of crime trends and associated support for particular solutions to crime, related to what media researchers refer to as "interpretive packages" (Gamson, 1988;Gamson and Modigliani, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a smaller body of work, researchers have sought to move beyond fear to consider the connection between media consumption and several nonaffective reactions to crime, including ratings of crime seriousness (Gebotys, Roberts, and DasGupta, 1988), assessments of the potential for victimization (Callanan, 2012), the perception that crime is rising (Pfeiffer, Windzio, and Kleimann, 2005), and support for various crime policies (Britto and Noga-Styron, 2014;Grabe and Drew, 2007;Holbert, Shah, and Kwak, 2004;Kleck and Jackson, 2017;Kort-Butler and Sittner Hartshorn, 2011). In building on this work, we examine the potential influence of the media on the framing of crime as a social problem (e.g., Drakulich, 2015a). In particular, we consider a set of interrelated frames, including both perceptions of crime trends and associated support for particular solutions to crime, related to what media researchers refer to as "interpretive packages" (Gamson, 1988;Gamson and Modigliani, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die bisherigen Erkenntnisse zu dieser "Wahrnehmungsverzerrung" (Drakulich 2013;Häfele 2013;Sampson und Raudenbush 2004) haben wir um den Befund ergänzt, dass dieser sozialräumliche Effekt (wiederum parallel zum Unsicherheitsempfinden) von der individuellen Einstellung zu Migration abhängt. Explizite xenophobe Einstellungen verstärken die Wahrnehmungsverzerrung deutlich, aber auch implizite ethnische Vorurteile (die in unserer Studie nicht gemessen wurden) unterstützen vermutlich Tendenzen zur Wahrnehmungsverzerrung (Drakulich 2015). Insgesamt unterstützen die Ergebnisse die Interpretation von Unsicherheit und Unordnung als verwandte Kognitionen sozialräumlicher Problemlagen, die bei vielen Bewohner*innen Unbehagen auslösen und sich am Thema Kriminalität kristallisieren (Hirtenlehner und Farrall 2013;Sampson 2009).…”
Section: Ergebnisse Ii: Einflussfaktoren Der Kriminalitätsfurchtunclassified
“…In der Sozialpsychologie wird zwischen expliziten und impliziten Einstellungen unterschieden; letztere wirken unbewusst, sind schwer zu messen und trotzdem sehr wirkungsmäch-tig (Dovidio et al 2016;Kawakami et al 2017). Mithilfe eines "Implicit Association Test" konnte Drakulich (2015) zeigen, dass implizite ethnische Stereotype einen stär-keren Effekt auf Unsicherheitswahrnehmungen hatten als explizite, da letztere durch den Effekt der sozialen Erwünschtheit unterdrückt werden können.…”
unclassified
“…In many instances, activists highlight these narratives on their websites as a way to point out to their state legislators as well as to the general public what they view as the unfair durational features of current alimony policy. In other words, these narratives serve a crucial role in framing or defining how these activists want a particular social problem perceived (Benford and Snow ; Drakulich ). Best () has argued that social problems are not objective issues to be solved, but rather issues subject to many, potentially competing debates regarding their resolution.…”
Section: Role Exit and Collective Action Frames Within The Alimony Rementioning
confidence: 99%