2001
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explanations from knowledge-based systems and cooperative problem solving: an empirical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast with what was found in [7], our Hypothesis 3 asserting a greater use of explanation in case of automated solving strategy selection was confirmed. However a key difference between the two studies needs to be highlighted.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast with what was found in [7], our Hypothesis 3 asserting a greater use of explanation in case of automated solving strategy selection was confirmed. However a key difference between the two studies needs to be highlighted.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…However a key difference between the two studies needs to be highlighted. In this contribution participants were asked to choose their preferred strategies while in [7] the automated vs. interactive strategy was treated as a between-subjects condition. In both sessions of our experiment it was found that participants who choose the automated strategy access explanation more frequently than subjects who chose the mixed-initiative approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Providing explanations in the context of decision aids has a long tradition in IS research and the existing empirical findings support the positive effects [14,12,16,30,17,15,48]. In the context of our research, we are especially interested in the effect of the explanations on the users' acceptance and trust of the provided recommendation as well as the effect of the users' cognitive effort.…”
Section: Instantiation and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Finally, some studies have used cognitive-fit theory (see e.g., Vessey and Galletta, 1991;Sinha and Vessey, 1992;Vessey, 1994). However, some previous empirical studies of teaching and learning show mixed results on the benefits of the teaching methods in improving users' performance in learning (Murphy, 1990;Eining and Dorr, 1991;Gregor, 1996). A plausible reason may be the appropriateness of theory used to predict the results.…”
Section: Teaching-methods-activity-fit Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%