2001
DOI: 10.1080/13501760110041532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining variation in institutional integration in the European Union: why firms may prefer European solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Just how the anticipation of such distributional impacts by different actors feeds into the creation of supranational governance structures remains unexplained by existing integration theories. Weber and Hallerberg (2001) have suggested that firms' preferences for more or less institutional integration depend on the transaction costs in a sector and the perceived level of threat among market players. While the argument carries weight, it fails to address important points: why would public actors heed private preferences?…”
Section: European Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just how the anticipation of such distributional impacts by different actors feeds into the creation of supranational governance structures remains unexplained by existing integration theories. Weber and Hallerberg (2001) have suggested that firms' preferences for more or less institutional integration depend on the transaction costs in a sector and the perceived level of threat among market players. While the argument carries weight, it fails to address important points: why would public actors heed private preferences?…”
Section: European Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have focused particularly heavily on different aspects of groups' economic profiles in shaping government policy, including the relative size of factor endowments (Rogowski, 1989), the degree of asset-specific sectoral investments (Frieden, 1991), combinations of the two (Hiscox, 2001), and the exposure to international markets (Milner, 1988). This approach has also been extended to the study of international rule-making and informs important studies of the European Union (Moravcsik, 1998;Weber & Hallerberg, 2001).…”
Section: Alternative Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the EU, this process is strengthened by the construction of the Single European Market. The intensification of international competition may, for instance, lead firms to support greater political binding at the EU level, thus adding extra force to the Europeanisation of public decision making (Weber and Hallerberg 2001). Economic and political developments in the wake of European integration hence comprise very complicated and mutually reinforcing processes.…”
Section: Europeanisation and National Business Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%