2003
DOI: 10.1017/s0022278x03004294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining the unexpected: electoral reform and democratic governance in Burkina Faso

Abstract: The parliamentary elections of May 2002 in Burkina Faso saw the ruling party loose its exclusionary grip on power. For the first time since the restoration of democracy in 1991, the parliamentary opposition now represents a sizeable group. While it retains the majority, the ruling party has to share legislative power with the opposition. These elections marginally alter the structure of power in a deeply presidential system of government. Several institutional and electoral reforms have played a critical role … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, some of the rare studies on parties in Francophone Africa manage to treat the topic without referring once to ethnicity (Baudais and Chauzal, 2006;Buijtenhuijs, 1994;Santiso and Loada, 2003).…”
Section: Single-country Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some of the rare studies on parties in Francophone Africa manage to treat the topic without referring once to ethnicity (Baudais and Chauzal, 2006;Buijtenhuijs, 1994;Santiso and Loada, 2003).…”
Section: Single-country Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…also Manning 2005, Carey 2002). On the other hand, some of the rare studies on parties in Francophone Africa manage to treat the topic without referring once to ethnicity (Baudais and Chauzal 2006, Buijtenhuijs 1994, Santiso and Loada 2003.…”
Section: Erdmann 2007b)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Dissemination of information in nondemocracies is problematic because media tend to be controlled by the government. Moreover, according to expert accounts on Africa, rulers sometimes allow F&F elections up to the point that their authority is not threatened (May & Massey, 2001;Santiso & Loada, 2003). Control of the judiciary can ensure that in case an unexpected result occurs, courts may intervene and protect the government.…”
Section: The Duverger Model and Violations Of Its Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%