2017
DOI: 10.1108/jopp-17-03-2017-b003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining sme participation and success in public procurement using a capability-based model of tendering

Abstract: Abstract. This paper develops and tests a model for explaining small and medium-size enterprise (SME) participation and success in public procurement. The model is informed by a capability-based view of public sector tendering that includes relational and procedural dimensions. To test the model a survey was carried out on firms competing for contracts with Irish public sector organizations (n = 3010). The survey was repeated one year later to demonstrate reliability (n = 3092). Overall, the results lend suppo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(111 reference statements)
1
27
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if it is acknowledged that lot-wise tenders are beneficial for SMEs, that judgement is often based on the deductive observation of SMEs’ proposals and government action plans (articulation of political will to support SMEs) (Loader, 2015). Other recent studies have addressed SMEs in public procurement, but they have adopted another focus (Stake, 2015; Flynn and Davis, 2017; Reijonen et al , 2014; Karjalainen and Kemppainen, 2008). Except for the data of this study, there are a lack of quantitative data available to assess the effectiveness of lot-wise tenders in public procurement, whereas there are numerous claims to enforce lots in public procurement as a means to support SMEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even if it is acknowledged that lot-wise tenders are beneficial for SMEs, that judgement is often based on the deductive observation of SMEs’ proposals and government action plans (articulation of political will to support SMEs) (Loader, 2015). Other recent studies have addressed SMEs in public procurement, but they have adopted another focus (Stake, 2015; Flynn and Davis, 2017; Reijonen et al , 2014; Karjalainen and Kemppainen, 2008). Except for the data of this study, there are a lack of quantitative data available to assess the effectiveness of lot-wise tenders in public procurement, whereas there are numerous claims to enforce lots in public procurement as a means to support SMEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That poses the question of how contract awards can be distinguished with regard to competition. In contrast to other approaches (Flynn and Davis, 2017), this study ranks the legally given types of award procedures according to competition. For example, an open procedure is advertised in publicly available media so that anyone who is interested in the contract will be invited to tender to ensure maximum competition (European Commission, 2014b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the field of smart cities, the involvement of start-ups and SMEs in public procurement for innovation is considered essential, as they intensify competition by offering greater choices to the public purchasers with their skills and competencies to create innovative products [36]. From a sustainability and social perspective, encouraging the SMEs' involvement in public contracting contributes to the economic and social health of a region, creating jobs and fostering entrepreneurship and innovation throughout the wider economy [37][38][39].…”
Section: Innovation-friendly Considerations In the European Public Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, public procurement of innovation supports access to markets for SMEs and help address major societal challenges (European Union, 2018). The benefits of public sector contracting to SMEs lies in its ability to stimulate innovation when buyers insist on technologically-sophisticated products that encourage firms to develop novel service solutions (Georghiou et al , 2014; Flynn and Davis, 2017). Following the enactment of the new EU procurement directive (Directive 2014/24/EU), it is important to gain more insights into the implementation of public procurement of innovative solutions at an organizational level, an aspect that has not been addressed explicitly by extant literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%