2010
DOI: 10.1017/s1366728909990022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining individual variation in L2 perception: Rounded vowels in English learners of German

Abstract: Most empirical research in L2 vowel perception focuses on the development of groups of learners. However, recent studies indicate that individual learners' developmental paths in L2 vowel perception may not be uniform (e.g., Escudero, 2001;Escudero and Boersma, 2004;Morrison, 2009

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that listeners were in a Dutch monolingual perception mode because they were only addressed in Dutch during this part of the experiment, oral and written instructions were in Dutch, and the words on the screen were read aloud in Dutch before the start of the experiment. This assumption is also motivated by previous findings of monolingual perception for Dutch and English listeners, regardless of their L2 proficiencies, when presented with a monolingual task similar to the one used in the present study (Escudero & Boersma, 2002;Mayr & Escudero, 2010).…”
Section: The Dutch Categorization Taskmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We assume that listeners were in a Dutch monolingual perception mode because they were only addressed in Dutch during this part of the experiment, oral and written instructions were in Dutch, and the words on the screen were read aloud in Dutch before the start of the experiment. This assumption is also motivated by previous findings of monolingual perception for Dutch and English listeners, regardless of their L2 proficiencies, when presented with a monolingual task similar to the one used in the present study (Escudero & Boersma, 2002;Mayr & Escudero, 2010).…”
Section: The Dutch Categorization Taskmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In that respect, Escudero and Boersma (2004) and Morrison (2009) showed that learners' initial attention to the specific dimensions that are involved in the production of an English vowel contrast, specifically their relative perception of duration versus the vowels' F1 and F2 values, affected their subsequent L2 development. Similarly, Mayr and Escudero (2010) showed that L2 contrasts that were assimilated to a single L1 category in a non-native identification task where listeners classify the L2 sounds in terms of native sounds turned out to be the most difficult ones in an L2 categorization task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For instance, Escudero and Boersma (2004) proposed that Spanish learners of Standard Southern British and Scottish English go through different developmental paths depending on the variety of English they are learning. Interestingly, however, two recent studies have shown that these developmental paths are also learner-dependent (Morrison, 2009;Mayr and Escudero, 2010). In these studies, there was systematic variation between learners, despite the fact that they had all been exposed to a single variety of their target language.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To begin with, an investigation of the GEN 1 MUMS' L2 English stops revealed a number of learners (e.g., Colantoni, Steele & Escudero, 2015;Flege, 1995;Hansen Edwards & Zampini, 2008;Mayr & Escudero, 2010). Note, however, that the GEN 1 MUMS also showed evidence of successful acquisition.…”
Section: Acquisition Patterns: Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%