2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0049-089x(02)00018-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining ethnic polarization over attitudes towards minority rights in Eastern Europe: A multilevel analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, several studies have found no significant relationship (Evans and Need 2002;Hjerm 2007;Schlueter and Scheepers 2010), while others have found a positive association (e.g., Wagner et al 2003Wagner et al , 2006 between the relative size of the minority population and positive out-group attitudes. For this positive relation, Wagner and colleagues have argued that diverse neighbourhoods may provide more opportunities for positive intergroup contact, which can decrease citizens' negative attitudes.…”
Section: Diversity and Out-group Attitudes In The Netherlands: The Romentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, several studies have found no significant relationship (Evans and Need 2002;Hjerm 2007;Schlueter and Scheepers 2010), while others have found a positive association (e.g., Wagner et al 2003Wagner et al , 2006 between the relative size of the minority population and positive out-group attitudes. For this positive relation, Wagner and colleagues have argued that diverse neighbourhoods may provide more opportunities for positive intergroup contact, which can decrease citizens' negative attitudes.…”
Section: Diversity and Out-group Attitudes In The Netherlands: The Romentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Previously, the country-level study of Hjerm (2007), the region-level study of Evans and Need (2002), and the municipality-level study of Schlueter and Scheepers (2010) have indicated that perceived as well as actual minority proportion have no straightforward link with attitudes towards ethnic minorities. Semyonov and colleagues (2004), however, found a main effect for subjective (but not for objective) diversity at the district-level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not much attention has been paid, however, to people's attitudes towards minority rights and the social psychological factors explaining these attitudes (but see, for example, Evans & Need, 2002;McIntosh, MacIver, Abel, & Nolle, 1995;Scheepers, Gijsberts, & Coenders, 2002). In addition, existing studies tend to examine the majority group's views on minority rights while ignoring the perspectives of minority groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from size and status, there are always many other group characteristics (e.g., cultural and historical) that may explain the differences found. To avoid such problems, a whole array of groups and nations should be studied (Evans & Need, 2002;Scheepers et al, 2002). Alternatively, an experimental approach can be taken, and in social psychology many experiments have examined the importance of group size and group status for intergroup relations (see Ellemers & Barreto, 2001;Mullen, Brown, & Smith, 1992;Simon, Aufderheide, & Kampmeier, 2001, for reviews).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Older, less educated people and extrinsic believers -characterized by an instrumental approach to religion -generally show less favourable attitudes towards cultural diversity. These differences are mainly interpreted into the framework of group threat theory (Quillian, 1995;McLaren, 2003;Evans and Need, 2002). The (realistic or perceived) threat from a minority and subordinate group is often seen as the single best indicator of negative attitudes towards out-groups (Paxston and Mughan 2006).…”
Section: Analysing Multicultural Attitudes and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%