2022
DOI: 10.1037/prj0000490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining engagement in outpatient therapy among adults with serious mental health conditions by degree of therapeutic alliance, therapist empathy, and perceived coercion.

Abstract: Objective: Adults with serious mental health conditions (SMHC) experience higher rates of disengagement from treatment. Factors associated with engagement in treatment in general for this population include therapeutic alliance, provider empathy, and perceived coercion. This cross-sectional exploratory study addressed the question: To what extent do client perceptions of therapeutic alliance, therapist empathy, and perceived coercion explain the degree of engagement in outpatient therapy for adults with SMHC? … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article offers an initial conceptualization of the overlay between recovery and the common processes of psychotherapy. The practical recommendations presented in this article extend research that demonstrates linkages between psychotherapy process and recovery outcomes of individuals living with mental health conditions and receiving psychological services (e.g., Mallonee et al, 2022; Neale & Rosenheck, 1995) by providing psychologists and other mental health providers with specific clinical recommendations. In doing so, this article helps to resolve practical confusion and misuses of recovery in practice that others have previously identified (Jaiswal et al, 2020; Slade et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This article offers an initial conceptualization of the overlay between recovery and the common processes of psychotherapy. The practical recommendations presented in this article extend research that demonstrates linkages between psychotherapy process and recovery outcomes of individuals living with mental health conditions and receiving psychological services (e.g., Mallonee et al, 2022; Neale & Rosenheck, 1995) by providing psychologists and other mental health providers with specific clinical recommendations. In doing so, this article helps to resolve practical confusion and misuses of recovery in practice that others have previously identified (Jaiswal et al, 2020; Slade et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Few studies in the recovery literature have examined process variables (particularly the working alliance) and their impact on functional and treatment-related outcomes among individuals living with mental illnesses. These studies find that a stronger working alliance is associated with reduced symptom severity and increased global functioning (Neale & Rosenheck, 1995) as well as increased engagement in outpatient mental health services (Mallonee et al, 2022). However, beyond noting the importance of process factors in recovery outcomes, no comprehensive attempts have been made to detail the ways in which the process of psychotherapy unfolds within a recovery-oriented framework.…”
Section: Identifying the Core Elements Of Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 research consistently reports that care matched to a person's preferences and values leads to better engagement, adherence and satisfaction with treatment and services, 39,40 while also promoting self-determination, choice and autonomy, which are core components of recovery-orientated practice. 41,42 Principles of shared decision-making include a positive therapeutic alliance, which is a strong predictor of engagement in therapy 43 and outcomes in case management services in community mental health. 44 The development of supportive social environments, created by social prescribing services, allowed service users to build their own community and support network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to empirical evidence for rapid change in alliance and distress, in conjunction with early attrition, research has also demonstrated empirical associations in expected directions among these constructs. Client attrition has been linked with alliance and distress as well as with client expectations, therapeutic dosage, motivation to begin therapy, and both client and therapist interpersonal skills (Clarkin & Levy, 2004;Garland et al, 2012;Holdsworth et al, 2014;Longo et al, 1992;Mallonee et al, 2021;McEvoy et al, 2013;Sun et al, 2021;Swift & Greenberg, 2012;Tracey, 1986;Tryon, 2002). Client attrition, for example, often occurs at roughly the same time the alliance fails to form (Sharf et al, 2010;Tryon & Kane, 1993).…”
Section: Relations Among Alliance Distress Expectations and Attritionmentioning
confidence: 99%