2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining brightness illusions using spatial filtering and local response normalization

Abstract: We introduce two new low-level computational models of brightness perception that account for a wide range of brightness illusions, including many variations on White's Effect [Perception, 8, 1979, 413]. Our models extend Blakeslee and McCourt's ODOG model [Vision Research, 39, 1999, 4361], which combines multiscale oriented difference-of-Gaussian filters and response normalization. We extend the response normalization to be more neurally plausible by constraining normalization to nearby receptive fields (mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
115
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
115
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many approaches to the study of illusion perception such as Gestalt psychology (Gregory & Heard, 1979;Gilchrist et al, 1999), computational models (Fermüller & Malm, 2004;Robinson et al, 2007), neuro-biological, and cognitive neuro-science approaches (Grossberg & Todorovic, 1988;Penacchio & Otazu, 2013). Our model is a bioplausible computational model inspired by the low level multiscale filtering performed in the retina itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many approaches to the study of illusion perception such as Gestalt psychology (Gregory & Heard, 1979;Gilchrist et al, 1999), computational models (Fermüller & Malm, 2004;Robinson et al, 2007), neuro-biological, and cognitive neuro-science approaches (Grossberg & Todorovic, 1988;Penacchio & Otazu, 2013). Our model is a bioplausible computational model inspired by the low level multiscale filtering performed in the retina itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the length scale of the illusory effect increases with the wavelength of the background waveform, a fact which suggests that the perceptual mechanism which is generating this illusion does not impose any inherent length scale of its own and the length scales observed in the illusory effect are derived from the input stimulus itself. The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) spatial filter and its derivatives like LODOG or FLODOG of brightness perception are perceptual models based on this principle [13,14]. However, they too suffer from limitations.…”
Section: General Discussion and Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the smaller length scales) of the stimulus [20]. This observation, it is easy to see, would also be difficult for the image filtering models to reproduce, including the highly successful ODOG model of Blakeslee & McCourt and its derivatives, since in these models tiny changes in input will only produce tiny changes in output and will not wipe out the illusion altogether [13,14].…”
Section: General Discussion and Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the models come from the so-called DOG rule (Difference of Gaussian) [8]. DOG is a mathematical algorithm based on Gauss filters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%