2019
DOI: 10.1515/openec-2019-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining and tackling the informal economy: an evaluation of competing perspectives

Abstract: This paper provides an evidence-based evaluation of the competing ways of explaining and tackling the informal economy. Conventionally, participants have been viewed as rational economic actors who engage in the informal economy when the benefits outweigh the costs, and thus participation is deterred by increasing the sanctions and/or risks of detection. Recently, however, an alternative social actor approach has emerged viewing participation to result from a lack of vertical trust (i.e., their norms, values a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other rational economic explanations include discounts, easy negotiation and the possibility of receiving presents from the seller. This is in line with Schneider and Enste [48] and Williams [19,42,43], as consumers try to gain the best price possible in their interest, and the products and services are not marketed under fiscal burdens. However, almost half of participants (seven participants) did not cite lower cost at all, and more than half of participants (nine participants) cited a reason other than lower cost when purchasing in the informal economy.…”
Section: Rational Economic Actor Perspectivesupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other rational economic explanations include discounts, easy negotiation and the possibility of receiving presents from the seller. This is in line with Schneider and Enste [48] and Williams [19,42,43], as consumers try to gain the best price possible in their interest, and the products and services are not marketed under fiscal burdens. However, almost half of participants (seven participants) did not cite lower cost at all, and more than half of participants (nine participants) cited a reason other than lower cost when purchasing in the informal economy.…”
Section: Rational Economic Actor Perspectivesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Most of the literature on the informal economy investigates the supply side, focusing on how many people work in the informal economy, who does so and/or the motives for working in the informal economy [7,20,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. Little research has investigated the demand side of the informal economy, especially on the motives for purchasing undeclared goods and services.…”
Section: Why Do Consumers Purchase From the Informal Economy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, the vast majority of studies have focused upon the supply-side examining employers and workers participation in undeclared work. These studies examine the types of work conducted (ILO, 2018; Williams, 2014), the demographic and socio-economic characteristics of informal workers and businesses (ILO, 2018; OECD, 2017; Williams and Bezeredi, 2019; Williams and Yang, 2018; World Bank, 2019), and their motives for participating in undeclared work (Maloney, 2004; Shahid et al , 2019; Williams, 2019; World Bank, 2019). Much less attention has been given to the demand-side.…”
Section: Explaining the Cash-in-hand Consumer Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Schneider and Enste, 2000;Williams, 2008). As such, from the consumer perspective, each transaction implies a quick evaluation of the cost/benefit ratio and if the gain for the customer is higher in the informal market, where the transaction is not subject to fiscal burdens (i.e., VAT or income tax), then the decision is made in favor of informal market purchase (Williams, 2017(Williams, , 2019.…”
Section: Rational Economic Actor Theoretical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%