2014
DOI: 10.1177/1094428114541701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explained Variance Measures for Multilevel Models

Abstract: One challenge in using multilevel models is determining how to report the amount of explained variance. In multilevel models, explained variance can be reported for each level or for the total model. Existing measures have been based primarily on the reduction of variance components across models. However, these measures have not been reported consistently because they have some undesirable properties. The present study is one of the first to evaluate the accuracy of these measures using Monte Carlo simulation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
155
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
155
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, according to the pseudo R 2 statistic (LaHuis et al, 2014), age, control variables, job characteristics, and interactions between age and job characteristics explained 30% of the variance in job attraction (see Table 3). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, according to the pseudo R 2 statistic (LaHuis et al, 2014), age, control variables, job characteristics, and interactions between age and job characteristics explained 30% of the variance in job attraction (see Table 3). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We modeled heterogeneity in the average levels of the response variables and the effects of social distance as random effects, using linear mixed models algorithms provided by the package lme4 (Bates et al, 2014) for the software R (R Core Team, 2014). To obtain standardized effect sizes, we used a function provided by LaHuis et al (2014) which calculates the approximate explained variance at Level 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These previous articles featured generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLMMs) as the most versatile engine for estimating R 2 and ICC (specifically R 2 GLMM and ICC GLMM ). Our descriptions were limited to random-intercept GLMMs, but Johnson [4] has recently extended the methods to random-slope GLMMs, widening the applicability of these statistics (see also, [5, 6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%