2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2018.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments and meso-scale modeling of phase holdups and bubble behavior in gas-liquid-solid mini-fluidized beds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bubble diameter increased with U G and decreased with the superficial liquid velocity U L . According to previous studies, 23 the bubble diameter in the gas–liquid mini‐bubble column was generally smaller than that in the three‐phase mini‐fluidized bed. For gas–liquid two‐phase flow, the bubble diameter variation trend is similar to that of three‐phase mini‐fluidized bed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bubble diameter increased with U G and decreased with the superficial liquid velocity U L . According to previous studies, 23 the bubble diameter in the gas–liquid mini‐bubble column was generally smaller than that in the three‐phase mini‐fluidized bed. For gas–liquid two‐phase flow, the bubble diameter variation trend is similar to that of three‐phase mini‐fluidized bed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Among the researches on the mini-scale multiphase flow systems, there have been some reports on the micro-or mini-scale fluidized beds. The main topics are to determine the hydrodynamic parameters of the mini-fluidized bed, such as flow regime, minimum fluidization velocity, minimum bubble velocity, bubble size, bubble terminal velocity, and so on, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] by means of pressure drop measurement and high-speed photography. Compared with conventional fluidized beds, it is found that some factors negligible in macro flow play a major role in mini-flow systems, such as flow regime transitions influenced by the ratio of bed to particle diameter, which can be attributed to local heterogeneous fluidization caused by wall effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the three-phase turbulent flow field, the bubbles and particles have parallel movement and rotation during the movement [38], and at the same time, the instantaneous vortex generated by the bubble burst causes the particles to rotate [39][40][41]. Using the above models, the flow field profiles can be obtained.…”
Section: Name Symbol Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bubbling behavior of gas–liquid two‐phase flow widely exists in chemical, biological, environmental industries, etc . Especially for various multiphase reactor applications, such as gas–liquid bubble column reactor, gas–liquid–solid fluidized reactor, and sieve‐plate column reactor, the initial detachment state of the bubbles is critical to the shape, size, oscillation, interaction, dissolution of bubbles during the subsequent migration. The floating bubbles make significant convection and mixing inside the reactor, which influences the gas–liquid contact time and contact area, thus affects the heat and mass transfer process between gas and liquid phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%