2021
DOI: 10.4000/edc.11415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expérimenter la recherche-projet en doctorat : applications dans les champs de la santé et du handicap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, our modus operandi was based on a research-project approach to social innovation design, understood as design for social benefit [ 46 ], relying on users’ abilities [ 132 ], and taking into account the way users experience and act in their ecological context [ 156 ]. This participatory approach, intended to build bridges between scientific research and field practices (and between top-down and bottom-up scientific approaches) in order to improve the relevance of the product or service [ 81 ], involves experiments (informed by theoretical inputs) and its co-design with users [ 78 ]. Hence, interviews, observations, and ecological testing, conducted by students enrolled on a Masters’ program in social innovation design at [removed for anonymous reviewing] University, were used to create an initial version of the set of tools used in the various sessions (e.g., use of boards, allowing for group discussion and handwriting).…”
Section: Methods and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, our modus operandi was based on a research-project approach to social innovation design, understood as design for social benefit [ 46 ], relying on users’ abilities [ 132 ], and taking into account the way users experience and act in their ecological context [ 156 ]. This participatory approach, intended to build bridges between scientific research and field practices (and between top-down and bottom-up scientific approaches) in order to improve the relevance of the product or service [ 81 ], involves experiments (informed by theoretical inputs) and its co-design with users [ 78 ]. Hence, interviews, observations, and ecological testing, conducted by students enrolled on a Masters’ program in social innovation design at [removed for anonymous reviewing] University, were used to create an initial version of the set of tools used in the various sessions (e.g., use of boards, allowing for group discussion and handwriting).…”
Section: Methods and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More speci cally, our modus operandi was based on a research-project approach to social innovation design, understood as design for social bene t (Chick, 2012), relying on users' abilities (Manzini, 2007), and taking into account the way users experience and act in their ecological context (Nova, 2014). This participatory approach, intended to build bridges between scienti c research and eld practices (and between top-down and bottom-up scienti c approaches) in order to improve the relevance of the product or service (Fournier et al, 2021), involves experiments (informed by theoretical inputs) and its co-design with users (Findeli, 2015). Hence, interviews, observations, and ecological testing, conducted by students enrolled on a Masters' program in social innovation design at [removed for anonymous reviewing] University, were used to create an initial version of the set of tools used in the various sessions (e.g., use of boards, allowing for group discussion and handwriting).…”
Section: Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%