2016
DOI: 10.1163/1568539x-00003354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimentally altered plumage brightness of female tree swallows: a test of the differential allocation hypothesis

Abstract: The differential allocation hypothesis posits that individuals should invest in the current reproductive attempt according to the attractiveness of their mate, but studies of allocation by males when female traits are manipulated to be more attractive are lacking. In the current study, we experimentally enhanced and reduced the plumage brightness of female tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) relative to controls to examine whether males adjust investment in parental care according to female attractiveness, whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
47
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The brightness of plumage following the manipulation fell within the natural range of plumage brightness for female tree swallows (Berzins and Dawson, 2016). Females in each treatment did not differ by age, body mass, plumage characteristics (see below), or capture date prior to experimental manipulation (all P values > 0.29).…”
Section: Study Area and General Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The brightness of plumage following the manipulation fell within the natural range of plumage brightness for female tree swallows (Berzins and Dawson, 2016). Females in each treatment did not differ by age, body mass, plumage characteristics (see below), or capture date prior to experimental manipulation (all P values > 0.29).…”
Section: Study Area and General Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…I determined the age of females using dorsal plumage colour (Hussell 1983), and ASY females were sequentially allocated to the enhanced, reduced, or control plumage brightness treatments by capture order, after determining a treatment order randomly. Details of the plumage brightness manipulation are described in Berzins and Dawson (2016). Briefly, plumage brightness was enhanced by applying nontoxic permanent blue marker, reduced by applying silicon paste evenly to the dorsal feathers of females, or remained unchanged by treating females with a marker containing water.…”
Section: Study Area and General Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations