2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab6953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental validation of recommended msr-correction factors for the calibration of Leksell Gamma Knife® Icontm unit following IAEA TRS-483

Abstract: Currently, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) TG-21 is the conventional protocol currently used for the calibration of the Leksell Gamma Knife® (LGK) (despite the publication of the AAPM TG-51 protocol). However, this protocol is based on the air-kerma standards requiring an elaborate conversion process resulting in an increase in the possibility of errors in the clinic. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Reports Series (TRS)-483 Code of Practice provides new recomme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the ABS phantom, the dose‐rates were also on average 1.6% greater when using the parallel detector orientation as opposed to the perpendicular orientation. The results presented by Mirzakhanian et al 17 agree with this study, in that applying the correction factors by Mirzakhanian et al 14 accounted for the differences between the SW phantom and ABS phantom.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For the ABS phantom, the dose‐rates were also on average 1.6% greater when using the parallel detector orientation as opposed to the perpendicular orientation. The results presented by Mirzakhanian et al 17 agree with this study, in that applying the correction factors by Mirzakhanian et al 14 accounted for the differences between the SW phantom and ABS phantom.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Mirzakhanian et al 17 recently investigated TRS‐483 using the correction factors by Mirzakhanian et al 14 and compared it to TG‐21 and TG‐51. Three phantoms and three ICs were used, and included the ABS and SW phantoms and a 31010 IC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Mirzakhanian et al [15], the detector orientation is different for the solid water phantom and the ABS phantom. Updating these values by including the results of more recent published studies is mandatory [14][15][16][17][18]. Once the absolute value of the absorbed dose rate is correctly measured for an MSR field, the field output factors should be determined.…”
Section: Small-field Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%