2003
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2002.5169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Validation of a Structural Health Monitoring Methodology: Part Iii. Damage Location on an Aircraft Wing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
134
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this contribution, outlier analysis based on frequency lines in the TFs was used for damage detection. A few years later, experimental validations on the use of TFs for damage detection ( [15], [16] and [17]) and localization [18] have been performed using vibration data from a laboratory wing box structure and a gnat aircraft wing. Detection was based on three different novelty detection techniques (outlier analysis, auto-associative neural networks and kernel density estimation), while localization was based on supervised learning using a multi-layer perception (MLP) neural network.…”
Section: Review Of Transmissibility-based Damage Detection and Localimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this contribution, outlier analysis based on frequency lines in the TFs was used for damage detection. A few years later, experimental validations on the use of TFs for damage detection ( [15], [16] and [17]) and localization [18] have been performed using vibration data from a laboratory wing box structure and a gnat aircraft wing. Detection was based on three different novelty detection techniques (outlier analysis, auto-associative neural networks and kernel density estimation), while localization was based on supervised learning using a multi-layer perception (MLP) neural network.…”
Section: Review Of Transmissibility-based Damage Detection and Localimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For damage detection, one should find the frequency bands for which the features are highly sensitive to damage and insensitive to variability in the normal condition [15]- [16]. For damage localization, an additional requirement is to find frequency bands in which the features are highly sensitive to one type of damage, and almost insensitive to the others [18]. A major problem is that these frequency bands cannot be determined a priori without having access to data from the structure in the different damage conditions and that in practice, such data is rarely available.…”
Section: Review Of Transmissibility-based Damage Detection and Localimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…foundation piles (Lilley et al, 1982) but has been attempted (with very limited success) on a wider range of civil structures, with variations on the technique investigated by many researchers. VBDD has had a more successful track record in aerospace engineering (Manson et al, 2003) where damage detection remains a viable technology. Like successful practical applications to foundation pile integrity testing, VBDD applications in aerospace rely less on modal parameter changes and more on wave transmission and reflection.…”
Section: Early Vbm and Vbddmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first author was involved in a body of research, funded by DERA/QinetiQ [1][2][3][4], on Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) which proposed a health monitoring system based upon novelty detection techniques. The aim of this overall body of research was to make as much progress as possible up the hierarchical fault detection structure [5] whilst retaining, or even improving, the robustness of the lower level solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next two parts [3,4] extended these techniques to levels 2 and 3 in the damage hierarchy, respectively. These were also conducted on the wing of the Gnat aircraft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%