Experimental validation of a kV source model and dose computation method for CBCT imaging in an anthropomorphic phantom

Abstract

We present an experimental validation of a kilovoltage (kV) X‐ray source characterization model in an anthropomorphic phantom to estimate patient‐specific absorbed dose from kV cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging procedures and compare these doses to nominal weighted CT‐dose index (CTDIw) dose estimates. We simulated the default Varian on‐board imager 1.4 (OBI) default CBCT imaging protocols (i.e., standard‐dose head, low‐dose thorax, pelvis, and pelvis spotlight) using our previously developed and easy to implement X‐ray point‐source model and source characterization approach. We used this characterized source model to compute absorbed dose in homogeneous and anthropomorphic phantoms using our previously validated in‐house kV dose computation software (kVDoseCalc). We compared these computed absorbed doses to doses derived from ionization chamber measurements acquired at several points in a homogeneous cylindrical phantom and from thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs) placed in the anthropomorphic phantom. In the homogeneous cylindrical phantom, computed values of absorbed dose relative to the center of the phantom agreed with measured values within ≤2% of local dose, except in regions of high‐dose gradient where the distance to agreement (DTA) was 2 mm. The computed absorbed dose in the anthropomorphic phantom generally agreed with TLD measurements, with an average percent dose difference ranging from 2.4%±6.0% to 5.7%±10.3%, depending on the characterized CBCT imaging protocol. The low‐dose thorax and the standard dose scans showed the best and worst agreement, respectively. Our results also broadly agree with published values, which are approximately twice as high as the nominal CTDIw would suggest. The results demonstrate that our previously developed method for modeling and characterizing a kV X‐ray source could be used to accurately assess patient‐specific absorbed dose from kV CBCT procedures within reasonable accuracy, and serve as further evidence that existing CTDIw assessments underestimate absorbed dose delivered to patients.PACS number(s): 87.57.Q‐, 87.57.uq, 87.10.Rt

Iodine nanoparticles enhance radiotherapy of intracerebral human glioma in mice and increase efficacy of chemotherapy

“…The solution to normalizing image signal to noise is a bow-tie filter and tomo-irradiation (rotation). This ideally produces isodose across the whole subject and is what is standard on all CT scanners without modification 75 , 76 (Fig. 7 ).…”

A failure modes and effects analysis quality management framework for image‐guided small animal irradiators: A change in paradigm for radiation biology

“…At the time of writing, the SARRP uses a kernel‐based superposition–convolution algorithm similar to those used clinically for MV x rays, although a Monte Carlo alternative has very recently been released . In general, kernel‐based superposition algorithms struggle to model the complex interplay of near‐isotropic scattering and photoelectric interactions at kV energies, although this is mitigated by the small aperture sizes used in IGCSAI. In contrast, the XRAD‐SmART uses a full Monte Carlo model which more accurately models the physical interactions at kV energies…”

Radiation therapy for deep periocular cancer treatments when protons are unavailable: is combining electrons and orthovoltage therapy beneficial?

“…The orthovoltage component of OBE plans were created using our kilovolt X-ray dose calculation software, kVDoseCalc for a Xstrahl 300 orthovoltage unit using a 200 kVp 30 cm FSD beam developed at our institution [ 17 ]. This software was previously used to characterize this X-ray beam and has been extensively validated for superficial kilovolt dose calculation applications [ 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 ]. The field aperture was created using the electron beam’s eye view of the PTVEval structure to simulate a surface cut-out.…”