2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental validation of 3D simulations of tungsten melt erosion under ITER-like transient loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…JET results are consistent with simulations of tungsten melting and propagation using the MEMOS code [33], which has been used to inform decisions on the choice of tungsten as the material for the first divertor in ITER. The results have also given confidence that flash melting of the tungsten divertor elements by ELMs is relatively benign compared to bulk melting as reported in other experiments [34].…”
Section: Bulk Tungsten Melt Experimentssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…JET results are consistent with simulations of tungsten melting and propagation using the MEMOS code [33], which has been used to inform decisions on the choice of tungsten as the material for the first divertor in ITER. The results have also given confidence that flash melting of the tungsten divertor elements by ELMs is relatively benign compared to bulk melting as reported in other experiments [34].…”
Section: Bulk Tungsten Melt Experimentssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…During tokamak experiments the situation is quite different. In ITER the plasma pressure may reach 10 3 P a and even higher values during ELMs (10 4 P a) [18], hence only during ELMs a significant plasma pressure could be accessible to drive the melt. Under TEXTOR conditions F p is typically 200P a and thus small in comparison to F j×B which moves the material along the sample edge, perpendicularly to the magnetic field.…”
Section: Results and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover the forces acting on the melt layer and the droplets will be different, because the plasma pressure will be much more dominant. In addition, the expected depth of the melt layer caused by transients will also be smaller [79], which also might influence its evolution. If tungsten is not the only PFM in a tokamak, mixed material effects could influence the performance of the W PFCs.…”
Section: Arcs and Meltingmentioning
confidence: 99%