2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.taml.2015.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on the stability of plate anchors in clay under cyclic loading

Abstract: a b s t r a c tAlthough the bearing capacity of plate anchors in clay has been studied extensively, the results considering the effects of offshore cyclic loading are relatively rare. In the present study, 1 g model tests are carried out to investigate the effect of cyclic loading on the bearing capacity of plate anchors in clay. The ultimate pullout capacity of plate anchors in clay decreases as the accumulated plastic shear strain grows due to the strain-softening of clay under cyclic loading. The load-displ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One-way cycling was previously considered to have limited negative/detrimental effect on the cyclic pullout capacity, the reduction of which could be compensated by increasing shear strength of the soil in front of the anchor due to the consolidation under the sustained loading. Nevertheless, recent experimental test results indicated that there exists a threshold of cyclic loading (fraction of the pullout capacity), beyond which the plate anchor may experience failure due to large displacement and stiffness degradation of the plate-soil interaction system [104,108,109].…”
Section: Cyclic Pullout Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-way cycling was previously considered to have limited negative/detrimental effect on the cyclic pullout capacity, the reduction of which could be compensated by increasing shear strength of the soil in front of the anchor due to the consolidation under the sustained loading. Nevertheless, recent experimental test results indicated that there exists a threshold of cyclic loading (fraction of the pullout capacity), beyond which the plate anchor may experience failure due to large displacement and stiffness degradation of the plate-soil interaction system [104,108,109].…”
Section: Cyclic Pullout Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The offshore oil and gas industry has used these anchors for both permanent and temporary moorings. Various experimental studies have been reported on drag anchors (Dunnavant and Kwan 1993;Neubecker and Randolph 1996a;Ozmutlu 2009;Liu et al 2010b;Shin et al 2011;Yu et al 2015). Similarly, analytical studies have been reported (Lelievre and Tabatabaee 1981;Degenkamp and Dutta 1989;Stewart 1992;Randolph 1995, 1996b;Thorne 1998;O'Neill et al 2003;Aubeny and Chi 2010;Liu et al 2010aLiu et al , 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers -Geotechnical Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.22.00245 clay varied with anchor shape, soil strength and the depth below the seabed, normalised by anchor width (Aubeny, 2019;Das and Seeley, 1975;Giampa et al, 2019;Jalilvand et al, 2022;Lai et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2010Liu et al, , 2012Meyerhof and Adams, 1968;Neubecker and Randolph, 1996;O'Neill et al, 2003;Roy et al, 2021aRoy et al, , 2021bSahoo and Ganesh, 2018;Thorne, 1998;Vesic, 1971: Yu et al, 2015: Zhuang et al, 2022. Novel concepts such as the suction embedded plate anchor (Zook and Keith, 2009), OMNI-Max anchor (Kim and Hossain, 2017), multiline ring anchor (Lee et al, 2021, Lee andAubeny, 2020), fish anchor (Chang et al, 2019, Hossain et al, 2023 and dynamically embedded plate anchor (O'Loughlin et al, 2014) have been developed in recent years.…”
Section: Cite This Articlementioning
confidence: 99%