2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on the spray characteristics discharging from elliptical diesel nozzle at typical diesel engine conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the volume fraction of gas was comparatively bigger for elliptical A and elliptical B at the same injection time as compared to the circle nozzle shape. In this study, the aspect Figure 11 that the simulation results are quantitatively consistent with the experimental results, and the average discrepancy between experiment by Yu et al [41], and the current experiment and simulations was within about 3.8% and 7.1%, respectively. Based on the assessment, the advantage of the simulation with Fluent was verified for sufficiently handling the spray formation behaviour.…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the volume fraction of gas was comparatively bigger for elliptical A and elliptical B at the same injection time as compared to the circle nozzle shape. In this study, the aspect Figure 11 that the simulation results are quantitatively consistent with the experimental results, and the average discrepancy between experiment by Yu et al [41], and the current experiment and simulations was within about 3.8% and 7.1%, respectively. Based on the assessment, the advantage of the simulation with Fluent was verified for sufficiently handling the spray formation behaviour.…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Figure 10, the result shows that almost identical results were obtained between the experiment and numerical simulations for spray tip penetration. Furthermore, the spray tip penetration average error between the experiment by Yu et al [41], and current experiment and simulations, were 5.16% and 6.33%, respectively. Figure 11 that the simulation results are quantitatively consistent with the experimental results, and the average discrepancy between experiment by Yu et al [41], and the current experiment and simulations was within about 3.8% and 7.1%, respectively.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the one hand, increasing the injection pressure can improve the aerodynamic effect of the jet and enhance the spray performances. However, higher injection pressure also increases the energy consumption [1]. On the other hand, the jet shape obtained by the general pressure atomization method is hollow and results in uneven spray and large size of atomized droplets, which is harmful to the quality of spray jet [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%