2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on the contribution of masonry infill in the behavior of RC frame under seismic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are considered as nonstructural components and are often, therefore, usually neglected in structural analysis and design [2]. If separation joints are not provided between the infilled walls and frames, under seismic excitations, these walls might contribute to the load resisting mechanism and failure pattern of RC frames [3]. During an earthquake, both the positive and negative role of infilled walls on RC frames have been observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are considered as nonstructural components and are often, therefore, usually neglected in structural analysis and design [2]. If separation joints are not provided between the infilled walls and frames, under seismic excitations, these walls might contribute to the load resisting mechanism and failure pattern of RC frames [3]. During an earthquake, both the positive and negative role of infilled walls on RC frames have been observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opening in infilled frames reduces strength, stiffness and energy dissipation of the infilled frames. Many researchers have investigated the effect of opening on the performance of RC frames through the experimental setup [3,4,13,14]. For damage evaluation, FEMA 306 [14] and FEMA 307 [15] identifies that openings within the infill panels are the most significant parameter affecting seismic behavior of infilled systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained show that the distributed loading results in a 18.5 and 29% increase in the strength and stiffness of Infilled frames. After conducting an experimental research on masonry-infilled RC frames with various lateral strengths, the lateral design strength ratio of RC frame to masonry infill, in-filled with hollow clay blocks, greater than 1.2 (including the partial safety factor of 1.3) is suggested in order to have controlled failure mechanisms and to reduce the negative impacts of masonry infills on RC frames [21]. In a parametric study, failure surface parameters and dilation angle were shown to have a significant effect on the ultimate strength, cracking stiffness, as well as on the preand post-ultimate behaviour of the infilled frames, while those for fracture energy were shown to have only a small degree of influence on the ultimate load and post-ultimate behaviour of the models [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental test results showed that the horizontally stacked infill formed a typical diagonal compressive strut and showed infill seismic performance than higher vertically stacked. Dautaj et al (2018) investigated that the behaviour of masonry-infilled reinforced concrete (RC) frames under various lateral strength. They found that the type of masonry unit influenced to the failure mechanism of masonry-infilled RC frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%