2013
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2012.2200901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study on the Atmospheric Delay Based on GPS, SAR Interferometry, and Numerical Weather Model Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pressure at a given altitude changes over time, even if slightly, up to a few percent of the total pressure, thus resulting in a difference of hydrostatic delay to a few centimetres. Moreover, the changes of terrain height introduce a spatial gradient in the atmospheric pressure across the SAR scene, which re- sults in a spatially variable signal in the hydrostatic delay (Mateus et al, 2013b). The variation of hydrostatic delay depending on the topography could be up to 15 mm in our study area.…”
Section: Atmospheric Delay In Insarmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This pressure at a given altitude changes over time, even if slightly, up to a few percent of the total pressure, thus resulting in a difference of hydrostatic delay to a few centimetres. Moreover, the changes of terrain height introduce a spatial gradient in the atmospheric pressure across the SAR scene, which re- sults in a spatially variable signal in the hydrostatic delay (Mateus et al, 2013b). The variation of hydrostatic delay depending on the topography could be up to 15 mm in our study area.…”
Section: Atmospheric Delay In Insarmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For all of those methods the challenge lies in avoiding leakage of the deformation signal in the atmospheric correction. Alternative approaches based on auxiliary data include corrections estimated from GPS data [31,32], spectrometer measurements [33], meteorological model data [27,34,35] as well as combined approaches [36][37][38]. While each of these techniques is capable of reducing the tropospheric InSAR noise, the success rate is often limited by the lower spatial resolution or availability of the auxiliary data [29].…”
Section: Techniques Of Atmospheric Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase modification due to atmospheric phenomena has been regarded as a "noise" for higher-precision InSAR observation for geophysical research such as earthquake and volcanic activity. To cope with this, many researches have been conducted to separate the atmospheric effect from deformation signals by the use of time series methods such as the persistent scatterer interferometry (PSIn-SAR; Ferretti et al 2000) and the Small BAseline Subset interferometry (SBAS; Berardino et al 2002), external observation data such as GNSS propagation delay data and spatial PWV data derived from multispectrum satellite images (e.g., Onn and Zebker 2006;Li et al 2009) and numerical modeling through the use of meteorological reanalysis data and numerical weather model outputs (e.g., Foster et al 2006;Jolivet et al 2011;Mateus et al 2013b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%