2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study on Sodiation of Amorphous Silicon for Use as Sodium-Ion Battery Anode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More importantly, a number of insertion sites had E b < 0 for Na, implying that a-Si should be electrochemically active for Na (while c-Si is not). In 2016, exactly this was confirmed in an experimental study of Lim et al [38]. This is an example of theory leading the experiment in the design of new electrode materials for post-Li batteries.…”
Section: Interactions Of LI Na K and Mg With Monoelemental Group Isupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More importantly, a number of insertion sites had E b < 0 for Na, implying that a-Si should be electrochemically active for Na (while c-Si is not). In 2016, exactly this was confirmed in an experimental study of Lim et al [38]. This is an example of theory leading the experiment in the design of new electrode materials for post-Li batteries.…”
Section: Interactions Of LI Na K and Mg With Monoelemental Group Isupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The defect formation energies of Na, and Mg defects (vs. vacuum reference states) in a-Si and a-C are comparable with the respective metal cohesive energies, meaning that insertion of Na and Mg atoms could be feasible. Sodiation of a-Si has now been confirmed experimentally [38]. This is in contrast to c-Si and graphite, where the storage of Na and Mg atoms is limited due to high energy cost of Na and Mg insertion into c-Si.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, less than an year back, Xu et al 17 reported that reversible uptake of Na in c-Si nanoparticles is possible (with reversible capacity of ∼250 mAh g −1 ), albeit at much reduced particle sizes of ∼20 nm; which would throw significant processing/handling challenges (in addition to lower tap densities). In another very recent work by Lim et al, 12 coating of a-Si by Sn led to net Na-capacities of ∼230 mAh g −1 , even though bare Si hardly showed any Na-capacity. With respect to Si-based composite electrodes, Zhao et al 18 reported Na-capacity of ∼280 mAh g −1…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Such predicted Na-capacity, even though significantly lesser compared to the Li-capacity, would still be considerably superior to those of most other potential anode materials. [3][4][5][6]15,16 Furthermore, lower Na-intake in Si would result in lower volume expansion compared to the case of Li-intake (viz., ∼114% for Na vs. ∼400% for Li), 11 which might just lead to lesser problems related to stress induced degradation and capacity fade in the case of Na.Due to the earlier belief concerning electrochemical Na-insertion being difficult in Si, [6][7][8][9][10]13 only very recently few experimental works 12,17,18 have explored the possibilities of electrochemical sodiation/de-sodiation in crystalline (c-Si) 6,17 and amorphous Si (a-Si) 12,18 in the form of nanoparticles. Indeed, both Ellis et al 7 and Komaba et al, 6 in their studies with Si particle sizes of 325 mesh * Electrochemical Society Student Member.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%