2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on finishing of internal laser melting (SLM) surface with abrasive flow machining (AFM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
20
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Chaneac et. al [24] used laser melting mechanism for the finishing of non heat treated maraginig steel 300 and observed that media viscosity and abrasive concentration affected the areal roughness. Bremerstein et.…”
Section: Orbital Afmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chaneac et. al [24] used laser melting mechanism for the finishing of non heat treated maraginig steel 300 and observed that media viscosity and abrasive concentration affected the areal roughness. Bremerstein et.…”
Section: Orbital Afmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the melt depth is larger than the layer thickness (since previous layers are also remelted to ensure sufficient bonding between the built layers [Yadroitsev et al 2013;Kamath et al 2014]), which induces a shape deviation (such as dross [Charles et al 2020;Feng et al 2020]) since the solidified thickness is larger than the designed one. In the microscale, printed surfaces (R a and S a ∼ 10 μm) are rougher than mechanically machined surfaces (Duval-Chaneac et al 2018;Wen et al 2018). This problem is especially severe for overhang regions whose surface roughness (R a ) is usually around 20 μm as a result of unmelted powder adhering to the edges of the solidified melt pool (Mazur et al 2016;Pakkanen et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been proposed for finishing the internal faces of tubes and channels. Duval-Chaneac et al [13] performed abrasive flow machining (AFM) on non-heattreated and heat-treated maraging steel 300 SLM surfaces with four different media under various abrasive concentrations (35%, 50%, and 65%) and different media viscosities (low viscosity and medium viscosity). The results indicated that abrasive concentration and media viscosity affect the evolution of areal roughness (Sa) in AFM for both non-heat-treated and heat-treated surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%