2006
DOI: 10.2208/prohe.50.583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study on Evacuation From Underground Space by Using Real Size Models

Abstract: Many floods caused by heavy rainfalls and typhoons hit Japan in recent years, and some floods attacked fully urbanized areas. Tokyo, Nagoya and Fukuoka were inundated by urban floods, and some parts of flood water intruded into underground spaces. During the floods, underground shopping arcades and subway stations were inundated. The inundation in underground space is one of the problems to resolve urgently. One of effective measures to reduce the damage of flood disaster is quick evacuation from the undergrou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the degree of flood hazard (Xia et al 2011), including: (1) formulae based on mechanical analysis and calibrated using laboratory experiments with models and/or real human subjects (Foster and Cox 1973;Abt et al 1989;Takahashi et al 1992;Karvonen et al 2000;Yee 2003;Jonkman and Penning-Rowsell 2008a, b;Russo et al 2013), and (2) formulae based on empirical or quasi-theoretical studies (Keller and Mitsch 1993;Lind et al 2004;Penning-Rowsell et al 2005a;Ramsbottom et al 2003Ramsbottom et al , 2006Ishigaki et al 2005Ishigaki et al , 2009). However, flood hazard assessments methods based only on laboratory experiments with models and/or real human subjects are usually too dependent on the physical characteristics of the model or the human subject, and cognitive characteristics of the tested human subjects, whereas flood hazard assessment methods based on empirical or quasi-theoretical work often excessively over-simplify the anatomy of human body and the hydraulic characteristics of the flow (Jonkman and Penning-Rowsell 2008a, b;Xia et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the degree of flood hazard (Xia et al 2011), including: (1) formulae based on mechanical analysis and calibrated using laboratory experiments with models and/or real human subjects (Foster and Cox 1973;Abt et al 1989;Takahashi et al 1992;Karvonen et al 2000;Yee 2003;Jonkman and Penning-Rowsell 2008a, b;Russo et al 2013), and (2) formulae based on empirical or quasi-theoretical studies (Keller and Mitsch 1993;Lind et al 2004;Penning-Rowsell et al 2005a;Ramsbottom et al 2003Ramsbottom et al , 2006Ishigaki et al 2005Ishigaki et al , 2009). However, flood hazard assessments methods based only on laboratory experiments with models and/or real human subjects are usually too dependent on the physical characteristics of the model or the human subject, and cognitive characteristics of the tested human subjects, whereas flood hazard assessment methods based on empirical or quasi-theoretical work often excessively over-simplify the anatomy of human body and the hydraulic characteristics of the flow (Jonkman and Penning-Rowsell 2008a, b;Xia et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other simulations, which do model death, only consider two conditions: dead or alive. For example, some researchers build their models based on an assumption that an evacuee perishes once flood water reaches a height of 70 cm, a point at which even adult men have difficulty walking, and there is no chance of rescue (Ishigaki et al, 2006;Uno & Kashiyama, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow rates at the staircases were calculated from the numerical results (Figure 8). There are two staircases on the ground floor, as shown in Figure 5a, and by using the results of the flow depth at these locations, the step-flow formula gave the discharges that were transmitted to the underground space [23][24][25].…”
Section: Underground Inundation In Two Layers By the Atmmentioning
confidence: 99%