2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study on Dynamic Behavior of CFRP-to-Concrete Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under static loads, the debonding process of the CFRP strips usually occurs with a thin layer of concrete [13,37] attached to the CFRP strip because concrete is expected to fail first as the epoxy strength is superior. Moreover, a dynamic increase factor at the interface between concrete and CFRP strip should be included due to the strain rate effect of the blast loading [38,39]. Based on this approach, a tiebreak contact algorithm is used to model the contact between the concrete and the CFRP strip in the most accurate way.…”
Section: Contact Algorithm Between Cfrp Strips and Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under static loads, the debonding process of the CFRP strips usually occurs with a thin layer of concrete [13,37] attached to the CFRP strip because concrete is expected to fail first as the epoxy strength is superior. Moreover, a dynamic increase factor at the interface between concrete and CFRP strip should be included due to the strain rate effect of the blast loading [38,39]. Based on this approach, a tiebreak contact algorithm is used to model the contact between the concrete and the CFRP strip in the most accurate way.…”
Section: Contact Algorithm Between Cfrp Strips and Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is why 45° inclined wrapping of FRP sheets yields better performance than U-wrapped RC members [69]. Impact loading changes the strain distribution, which has a wide gradient, and the loading rate greatly influences the bond strength of the FRPconcrete interface [70,71]; however, the failure mode and ductility of the strengthened structure do not directly depend on the loading rate.…”
Section: Impact Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensile strain energy of epoxy 2 2 a a f E , which is represented as the area under the tensile stress-strain curves of the epoxy was incorporated into the proposed model. The testing data from the existing studies [20,[46][47][48][49] and the testing data from this study were employed to conduct the regression analysis. Table 3 summarizes the specimen details and the test results.…”
Section: Interfacial Fracture Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As FRP debonding has been observed in many tests, e.g., the field blast tests conducted by Lee et al [4], it is necessary to quantitatively study dynamic interfacial bond behaviour between FRP and FRC at different strain rates. So far, very limited studies have been conducted to investigate the strain rate effect on the interfacial bond behaviour between FRP and concrete, and all these studies are limited to relatively low strain rates with the highest strain rate reached being around 4.9 s -1 [19][20][21]. This low strain rate does not necessarily reflect the true dynamic behaviour of FRP-retrofitted structures under high strain rates generated by high-speed impact and blast load, under which the strain rate of structural response can reach approximately up to a few hundred per second [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%