Experimental Study on Color Preference and Visual Fatigue Against LED Lighting

Muramatsu, Keiichi; Kaede, Kazunori; Tanaka, Eiichiro; Watanuki, Keiichi

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60495-4_9

“…These theories provide a first insight into psychological constructs with a potential relevance to passenger well-being in automated driving. When turning to research that investigates psychological constructs other than subjective well-being in transportation, additional psychological factors such as physical well-being (Marggraf-Micheel and Jäger, 2007;Winzen et al, 2014), comfort (Ahmadpour et al, 2014;Richards, 1980;Mayr, 1959;Oborne, 1978), perceived safety (Ahmadpour et al, 2014;Singleton, 2018), trust (Choi and Ji, 2015;Hoff and Bashir, 2015), aesthetics (Mandel and Maier, 2016;Bisping, 1995;Muramatsu et al, 2018) and symbolism (Ahn et al, 2015) were identified.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the concept of passenger well-being in the context of automated driving

Sauer

¹

,

Mertens

²

,

Heitland

³

et al. 2019

IJHFE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Motorised mobility is evolving with the introduction of driving automation. The transition from driver to passenger requires a renewed focus on passengers and their needs while travelling, making passenger well-being a highly interesting concept to investigate. However, as of yet, it is unclear how passenger well-being may be operationalised, and which factors may contribute to passenger well-being in this domain. An exploratory study (n = 40) indicated that passenger well-being can be understood as current subjective well-being and that it can be measured reliably using self-reported measures. Further, multiple regression analyses showed that depending on how well the individual preferences are met by the vehicle interior, passenger well-being is either predicted by perceived safety, aesthetics and symbolism (preferences met) or by physical well-being and distrust (preferences not met).

show abstract

“…These theories provide a first insight into psychological constructs with a potential relevance to passenger well-being in automated driving. When turning to research that investigates psychological constructs other than subjective well-being in transportation, additional psychological factors such as physical well-being (Marggraf-Micheel and Jäger, 2007;Winzen et al, 2014), comfort (Ahmadpour et al, 2014;Richards, 1980;Mayr, 1959;Oborne, 1978), perceived safety (Ahmadpour et al, 2014;Singleton, 2018), trust (Choi and Ji, 2015;Hoff and Bashir, 2015), aesthetics (Mandel and Maier, 2016;Bisping, 1995;Muramatsu et al, 2018) and symbolism (Ahn et al, 2015) were identified.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the concept of passenger well-being in the context of automated driving

Nitsch

¹

,

Mertens

²

,

Heitland

³

et al. 2019

IJHFE

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Motorised mobility is evolving with the introduction of driving automation. The transition from driver to passenger requires a renewed focus on passengers and their needs while travelling, making passenger well-being a highly interesting concept to investigate. However, as of yet, it is unclear how passenger well-being may be operationalised, and which factors may contribute to passenger well-being in this domain. An exploratory study (n = 40) indicated that passenger well-being can be understood as current subjective well-being and that it can be measured reliably using self-reported measures. Further, multiple regression analyses showed that depending on how well the individual preferences are met by the vehicle interior, passenger well-being is either predicted by perceived safety, aesthetics and symbolism (preferences met) or by physical well-being and distrust (preferences not met).

show abstract

Czech Drivers’ Glare Perception Survey

Viktorová

¹

,

Mičková

²

,

Stanke

³

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Worldwide, road-users complain about glare from oncoming cars’ headlights, often blaming new light sources such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs). However, drivers’ own behavior and attitudes might contribute to the issue of glare. The aim of this research was to establish the prevalence of on-road glare and its associations with drivers’ attitudes in a sample of Czech drivers. We used an online survey and gained responses from 539 passenger-car-drivers. The majority experienced glare at least once a week or almost daily, identifying mainly white- or bluish-colored headlights as the source of glare. However, about 60% of participants would prefer the view of the road that is provided by these sources, and an association was found between the preferred part of the lighting color spectrum and the perceived glare source color. A large proportion of drivers were also not aware of the specifics of the lighting sources that they used. These findings suggest the need for driver education in the area of automotive lighting and glare prevention.

show abstract

Experimental Study on Color Preference and Visual Fatigue Against LED Lighting

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

Exploring the concept of passenger well-being in the context of automated driving

Exploring the concept of passenger well-being in the context of automated driving

Exploring the concept of passenger well-being in the context of automated driving

Czech Drivers’ Glare Perception Survey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About