2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of turbulent oscillatory boundary layers in an oscillating water tunnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum flow velocity and acceleration in the test section are about 2 m/s and 2 m/s 2 , which are sufficiently high to create sheet-flow conditions. Yuan and Madsen [2014] showed that the system can very precisely generate the specified piston motion and the cross-sectional average velocity predicted from the piston velocity is in excellent agreement with the actual free-stream velocity measured in the test section. The overall inaccuracy in generating the intended free-stream oscillatory flow in the WCS is assessed to be less than 1 cm/s, which is immaterial compared to the amplitudes of oscillatory flows in this study (O(100 cm/s)), so it is not necessary to verify the free-stream flow with velocity measurements.…”
Section: Wave-current-sediment Facilitysupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The maximum flow velocity and acceleration in the test section are about 2 m/s and 2 m/s 2 , which are sufficiently high to create sheet-flow conditions. Yuan and Madsen [2014] showed that the system can very precisely generate the specified piston motion and the cross-sectional average velocity predicted from the piston velocity is in excellent agreement with the actual free-stream velocity measured in the test section. The overall inaccuracy in generating the intended free-stream oscillatory flow in the WCS is assessed to be less than 1 cm/s, which is immaterial compared to the amplitudes of oscillatory flows in this study (O(100 cm/s)), so it is not necessary to verify the free-stream flow with velocity measurements.…”
Section: Wave-current-sediment Facilitysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The laser line on a digital image is a red band (20-40 pixels wide) with the digital redness value (from 0 to 255 with 0 being black and 255 being red) across the red band decaying toward the edges in a manner resembling a normal distribution. Following Yuan and Madsen [2014], we perform normal-distribution fitting to the cross-band redness variation for each X-location and take the fitted peak as the position of the laser line Z(X) (in pixels). Based on some targets with known dimensions drawn on the front sidewall of the WCS, we first obtain the horizontal and vertical calibration parameters for the vertical plane of the WCS' front sidewall.…”
Section: Wave-current-sediment Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The whole facility is filled with water, so a vertical oscillation of the piston is translated into a horizontal oscillatory flow in the test channel, which is up to 2 m/s and 2 m/s 2 in velocity and acceleration, respectively. A few previous studies have demonstrated that the facility can accurately produce a target oscillatory flow with a variety of wave shape (see Yuan & Madsen, ). Thus, the facility can provide full‐scale approximation of wave‐driven near‐bed flows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common bottom roughness formulations for turbulent conditions assume a logarithmic velocity profile near the bed [Grant and Madsen, 1982;Fredsoe, 1984;Madsen, 1994], an approach that has been verified in laboratory studies [van der A et al, 2011;Yuan and Madsen, 2014]. The calculations of bottom shear stress using the bottom roughness and near-bed velocities include wave-current formulations [Madsen, 1994;Soulsby and Clarke, 2005], as well as terms to account for a fixed rippled bed [Grant and Madsen, 1979] or a movable bed [Harris and Wiberg, 2001].…”
Section: Methods A) Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%